[Creationist]

You are just attacking my intelligence as all who adhere to the theory of evolution.

Evolution is a philosophy that has no provable testable facts. Variation is not proof adaptation is not proof, and fossils are definitely not proof.

Geology does not require the theory of evolution to study it. Chemistry does not require the theory to study it. Astronomy does not require the theory to study it. Physics does not require the theory to study it. And Biology definitely does not require any part of the theory to study it.

Please show me one living transitional life lizard to bird, fish to lizard, monkey to man?

[RightWhale]

show me one living transitional life lizard to bird, fish to lizard, monkey to man

Why persist in looking for the wrong thing? That transitional form is a misconception and has nothing to do with evolution.

[allmendream]

I am not attacking anything. Science doesn’t deal in proof it deals in evidence.

If you don't deride Astronomers and Physicists as “evolutionists” then why does your thread deride ‘The Big Bang’ theory as formulated by Astronomers and Physicists? Why would you deride any Geologist as a “evolutionist” who doesn’t twist their readings to conform to your ideas of what revealed texts convey as to the age of the earth?

Your thread posting by P.J. Banyard never even got on to deriding the actual theory of evolution through natural selection, common descent, or even abiogenesis; just a rambling nonsensical derision of the Big Bang theory as described by ASTRONOMERS AND PHYSICISTS, you know....”evolutionists”. ;)