[allmendream]

I am not attacking anything. Science doesn’t deal in proof it deals in evidence.

If you don't deride Astronomers and Physicists as “evolutionists” then why does your thread deride ‘The Big Bang’ theory as formulated by Astronomers and Physicists? Why would you deride any Geologist as a “evolutionist” who doesn’t twist their readings to conform to your ideas of what revealed texts convey as to the age of the earth?

Your thread posting by P.J. Banyard never even got on to deriding the actual theory of evolution through natural selection, common descent, or even abiogenesis; just a rambling nonsensical derision of the Big Bang theory as described by ASTRONOMERS AND PHYSICISTS, you know....”evolutionists”. ;)

[Creationist]

Evidence is proof of something that has happened.

That evidence must be interpreted, how it is interpreted is where evolutionary philosophy comes into play.

If you look at a fossil found in some location and interpret it as an intermediate of something else, you have invoked a philosophy.

If you look at the stars and say that it is billions of years old you have invoked a philosophy.

The theory of evolution is a philosophy, a religion, it has no testable, repeatable, evidence to it defense. Only dreams and imaginations of those who propagate it.