Replies

“Well here is another fine example of the evolutionist religious belief ... But you can rest assured that science proves the Bible with out the use of smoke and mirrors more that the ever changing theory of evolution does.”

This just serves to illustrate your naive bigotry and ignorance, since evolution and all science is based on empiricism, the constant testing and evaluating of data. As more discoveries are made, theories are refined and sometimes even abandoned. That is why the concept of evolution changes over time. With evolution, it is geology, especially radiometric dating and the underlying laws of physics, that support evolution, that is, what we observe in the geologic record. This is not religion.

What is truly irritating about you creationist types, is how you force the eternal and everlasting God into a tiny box. For you, God creates the universe in seven days, then spends the rest of eternity doing nothing! How utterly selfish and primitive!

My God, on the other hand, did not stop after seven days. With His eternal glory and imagination, he is still creating and one of the ways He manifests his power is through what the enlightened perceive as evolution.

Consider this. God created everything in the universe, including the laws of physics. It is the mathematics of physics that support radiometric dating and the other scientific disciplines that support evolution.

To deny evolution is to deny the science and physics that support it - and to deny the laws of physics is to deny the existence of God.

If evolution is based upon empiricism, where is your licken or chizard? Where are those intermediates? Our are you a hopeful monster believer?

Who was there when lighting struck the mud puddle and life arose. Which by the way if you did not already know life has a written code, and any linguist will tell you and any information scientist will tell you it takes intelligence to write and discern any language. You can take all the alphabet soup you like and throw grenades all you life but you will nerve get one of Shakespeare's plays out of that chaotic mess.

Empiricism let us use that upon the section that was quoted from the book, where is you factual proof of this other dimension, where is you test to prove this dimension, where is you factual evidence that something can come from nothing exploding, where is your test.

No sir and/or madam evolution and the origins you believe in is all faith based. There is no factual evidence, no intermediates (fossils are not proof of intermediates as a dead bone is a dead bone no way to discern if it can from something different than it's own kind no way to discern if it produced any offspring let alone anything different than itself.) Adaptation and variation are not evolution as no new information and no different kind of organism.

No one has ever in the 150 years of bacterial study seen one kind of bacteria change into a different kind, again variation and adaptation are not evolution.

No one has ever produce life from non living matter.

You have a faith in man and a faith in a portion of science that is so untrue.

As to putting God in a box that is your doing I do not do that My God is almighty and is not sitting around doing nothing, he is healing, teaching, feeding, giving hope, saving from damnation.

Your god is not of the Bible for if he was then you would believe as others do that the Word of God is 100% correct and man is fallible.

You must be Coyotemans alter ego, because radiometric dating is such a flawed science, everything about it is based upon assumption and presuppositions of a universe with out a god.

I think you're the one putting God into a box here. Try reading the Bible, because if that's your idea of God doing nothing, then you're simply an idiot, and there's no other way to put it.