Replies

If evolution is based upon empiricism, where is your licken or chizard? Where are those intermediates? Our are you a hopeful monster believer?

Who was there when lighting struck the mud puddle and life arose. Which by the way if you did not already know life has a written code, and any linguist will tell you and any information scientist will tell you it takes intelligence to write and discern any language. You can take all the alphabet soup you like and throw grenades all you life but you will nerve get one of Shakespeare's plays out of that chaotic mess.

Empiricism let us use that upon the section that was quoted from the book, where is you factual proof of this other dimension, where is you test to prove this dimension, where is you factual evidence that something can come from nothing exploding, where is your test.

No sir and/or madam evolution and the origins you believe in is all faith based. There is no factual evidence, no intermediates (fossils are not proof of intermediates as a dead bone is a dead bone no way to discern if it can from something different than it's own kind no way to discern if it produced any offspring let alone anything different than itself.) Adaptation and variation are not evolution as no new information and no different kind of organism.

No one has ever in the 150 years of bacterial study seen one kind of bacteria change into a different kind, again variation and adaptation are not evolution.

No one has ever produce life from non living matter.

You have a faith in man and a faith in a portion of science that is so untrue.

As to putting God in a box that is your doing I do not do that My God is almighty and is not sitting around doing nothing, he is healing, teaching, feeding, giving hope, saving from damnation.

Your god is not of the Bible for if he was then you would believe as others do that the Word of God is 100% correct and man is fallible.

You must be Coyotemans alter ego, because radiometric dating is such a flawed science, everything about it is based upon assumption and presuppositions of a universe with out a god.

You must be Coyotemans alter ego, because radiometric dating is such a flawed science, everything about it is based upon assumption and presuppositions of a universe with out a god.

Thanks for disparaging me without as much as a courtesy ping!

As for science, what makes you think your opinion has any validity? You and your fellow creationists berate those few scientists who intrude into the realm of religion, but you don't hesitate to intrude into the world of science with your religious beliefs.

Your religious belief is of a different order than scientific evidence. If you want to continue to trash science, then be prepared to come up with scientific evidence, not the junk science and creation "science" found on creationist websites.

If all you have is religious belief, you are doing no different than the few scientists who creationists disparage for their claims regarding metaphysics and religion.

You simply can't have it both ways.