Skip to comments.
Is Dana Priest a Common Criminal?
contentions ^
| 8.7.2007
| Gabriel Schoenfeld
Posted on 08/07/2007 10:39:36 AM PDT by Contentions
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: Contentions
The criminals are those that provide her with classified information.
2
posted on
08/07/2007 10:41:14 AM PDT
by
Jaysun
(It's outlandishly inappropriate to suggest that I'm wrong.)
To: Contentions
No. A "common criminal" is somebody who steals hubcaps, or at worst kills a few people. Dana's doing her best to see to it that people will die by the thousands.
Pol Pot wasn't a "common criminal" either.
3
posted on
08/07/2007 10:43:06 AM PDT
by
Cyber Liberty
(Did Dennis Kucinich always look like that or did he have to submit to a series of shots? [firehat])
To: Contentions
As the article points out, freedom of the press, like the analogous attorney-client privilege, does not cover complicity in a crime, especially a major felony.
A lawyer is not obliged to rat on a client who proposes to commit a crime, I don’t believe, but he could be jailed if he agrees to participate in it.
Dana Priest, like several other reporters, has knowingly and willingly participated in outright crimes, as an accomplice or possibly as the instigator. Freedom of the press does not cover such criminal activities.
Yes, the worst criminals are the scum in the CIA, FBI, State Department, and congress who leak these sensitive classified documents and violate their oaths of office. But the reporters are complicit. They should be prosecuted and jailed until they reveal their sources at the very least.
The Justice Department understands this. But, regretably, it does nothing.
4
posted on
08/07/2007 10:49:48 AM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Contentions
5
posted on
08/07/2007 10:53:15 AM PDT
by
garyhope
(It's World War IV, right here, right now, courtesy of Islam.)
To: Contentions
6
posted on
08/07/2007 10:53:34 AM PDT
by
garyhope
(It's World War IV, right here, right now, courtesy of Islam.)
To: Contentions
Is the Ayatollah Shi’ite?
7
posted on
08/07/2007 10:54:43 AM PDT
by
rfp1234
(Nothing is better than eternal happiness. A ham sandwich is better than nothing. Therefore...)
To: Contentions
Her professional success depends in large part on her ability to ferret out secrets... Isn't she the one who looks like a ferret?
8
posted on
08/07/2007 10:56:17 AM PDT
by
Cowboy Bob
(Withhold Taxes - Starve a Liberal)
To: Cicero
Good analysis. I often wonder why the Justice Department is so curiously uninterested in pursuing the sources of intelligence leaks, even those clearly detrimental to American national interests. One would imagine that a sting operation of significant proportions would not significantly tax the resources or imagination of those whose profession it is to catch bad guys.
9
posted on
08/07/2007 10:57:57 AM PDT
by
andy58-in-nh
(There are two kinds of people: those who get it, and those who need to.)
To: Jaysun
No, reporters who pass on classified information that they are not entitled to have (meaning everything) are guilty of a crime. The Supreme Court in the Pentagon Papers case specifically reaffirmed that position, but said the government couldn’t prosecute them for merely having the material and they couldn’t stop them from publishing it (prior restraint). It was the act of passing it to others (in the form of an article) that would be a crime. She did that. She’s a criminal and should be prosecuted as such.
10
posted on
08/07/2007 10:59:34 AM PDT
by
Phsstpok
(Often wrong, but never in doubt)
To: Contentions
Going back to Watergate, the Washington Post has always hounded Republicans but in the old days investigative reporters actually worked for a living and had some ethics. Today the Post is mostly peopled by political activists posing as reporters. Some partisan hack, pencil-pusher delivers Dana Priest classified documents on a silver platter, she puts them in the paper and wins the Pulitzer Prize at the cost of American's safety. With papers like the Post and a town full of traitorous bureaucrats, Al Qaeda will be around for a long time.
11
posted on
08/07/2007 11:00:44 AM PDT
by
Brad from Tennessee
("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
To: Brad from Tennessee
Today the Post is mostly peopled by political activists posing as reporters. Gee, ya' mean that things have changed since Watergate days?
To: garyhope
To: Jaysun
Newsflash!!
Receipt of stolen goods is also a crime!!!!!!!
14
posted on
08/07/2007 11:46:12 AM PDT
by
G Larry
(Only strict constructionists on the Supreme Court!)
To: Bernard Marx
Yeah. They used to have to actually work. Today they just pull “news releases” off the FAX machine from the DNC, ACLU, Green Peace, Al Qaeda, etc., put their byline at the top of the page and hand it in to the editor.
15
posted on
08/07/2007 11:46:36 AM PDT
by
Brad from Tennessee
("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
To: Cicero
.....But, regretably, it does nothing....
Au contraire mi amigo (a little Frogmex there)
This week an investigation began into a leaker from I believe the Department of justice, a clinton hold over who might be the leaker of FISA stuff.
16
posted on
08/07/2007 11:48:51 AM PDT
by
bert
(K.E. N.P. +12 . Happiness is a down sleeping bag)
To: Cicero
17
posted on
08/07/2007 11:55:37 AM PDT
by
bert
(K.E. N.P. +12 . Happiness is a down sleeping bag)
To: bert; MeanWestTexan
Frog-mex, lol. I speak a lot of that.
I read all MWT's post, trying to learn a little heb-mex.
18
posted on
08/07/2007 11:56:09 AM PDT
by
txhurl
To: txflake
.....heb-mex.....
difficult to master. I only know one phrase....Yada Yada Yada por favor.
19
posted on
08/07/2007 11:59:47 AM PDT
by
bert
(K.E. N.P. +12 . Happiness is a down sleeping bag)
To: Jaysun
“The criminals are those that provide her with classified information.”
Yup. I’d like to see more busts along this line...time to raid the homes of some civilian employees and military officers that are leaking.
20
posted on
08/07/2007 12:00:05 PM PDT
by
DesScorp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson