.....A victory in Iraq would be a disaster for the Democrats....
I wouild take issue with that statement. Victory might be disaster for the far left, but not necessarily for the rank and file.
The changes blowing in the wind are not without cause. I have posted for some time that Hillary clinton knows that Iraq will be gone as an issue next year and has had the media pulling punches for some time now.
The pieces describing the possibility of winning are the result of the Clinton campaign making a shift in the thrust of the party from die hard anti’s to some as yet undefined provictory stance.
Hillary is in the process of wresting the Rats from the far left kooks to a centerist nest where most Rats actually reside. She is going to leave Reid, Durbin and Pelosi twisting in the winf. President Clinton can’t tolerate a Pelosi prime minister.
One more thought..... Everyone here should deep down think about what they are actually for. If they stand for America and for victory, They must carefully consider coming to DC for the Gathering of Eagles II on September 15.
There should be thoughts of putting money where the mouth is. There should be thoughts of meeting the Rat KOOKS on the street and actually face to face putting them in their place. There should be thoughts of personal responsibility for outcome vs leaving the work and expenditure of funds to others.
Begin making plans to got to DC today
I beg to differ, Hillary IS a far left kook, she just runs as a centrist to get elected. Most of the dems are leftist not centrist, unless you consider Guiliani a democrat.
Most of the dems and DU members are socialists, at least many of the high ranikng dems, Clinton, Durbin, Conyers, Kennedy, etc. They just don't practice moon-battery (in public).