Interesting....
1 posted on
07/30/2007 12:59:53 PM PDT by
pissant
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
To: pissant
Well, the title is intriguing. I’ll have to read the article later.
2 posted on
07/30/2007 1:02:10 PM PDT by
Kevmo
(We should withdraw from Iraq — via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.)
To: pissant
No, just you having your 3rd orgasm of the day...
3 posted on
07/30/2007 1:02:21 PM PDT by
xcamel
("It's Talk Thompson Time!" >> irc://irc.freenode.net/fredthompson)
To: pissant
4 posted on
07/30/2007 1:02:32 PM PDT by
JamesP81
(Keep your friends close; keep your enemies at optimal engagement range)
To: SE Mom; Politicalmom; jellybean; jdm; RockinRight
“Another shrill hit-piece” ping.
5 posted on
07/30/2007 1:05:17 PM PDT by
Petronski
(Just say no to Rudy McRomney.)
To: pissant
Noooooo! Not Spence! He's the reason Debbie "Dangerously Incompetent" Stabenow is our Senator!
6 posted on
07/30/2007 1:05:46 PM PDT by
Yo-Yo
(USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
To: pissant
7 posted on
07/30/2007 1:06:33 PM PDT by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
To: pissant
Another day SOS Pissant! No body’s buying the hunter attack machine.
9 posted on
07/30/2007 1:07:42 PM PDT by
org.whodat
(What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
To: pissant
All the times I heard Abrams speak I never heard him say anything pro-islamic to the sacrifice of Israel.
10 posted on
07/30/2007 1:08:01 PM PDT by
svcw
(There is no plan B.)
To: pissant
From 2006 Earlier this month, Duncan Hunter, in a behind-closed-doors meeting, killed an amendment sponsored by Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) that would have required a Department of Defense spending bill report card revealing to the public all pork barrel spending in Congressional bills, along with the names of their sponsors.
15 posted on
07/30/2007 1:12:28 PM PDT by
org.whodat
(What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
To: pissant
I’m no fan of Abraham either, but don’t you think this is a bit hyperbolic?
17 posted on
07/30/2007 1:12:46 PM PDT by
counterpunch
("The Democrats are the party of slavery." - Cindy Sheehan)
To: pissant
You are so damn repetitive even I am losing track...
OK Fred’s doomed because every one who hates hummus says so. Got it...
19 posted on
07/30/2007 1:15:46 PM PDT by
ejonesie22
(I am not really a Fred basher, I just play one on Free Republic. THOMPSON 2008!)
To: pissant
...Dymphna at Gates of Vienna, Elaine at Aaron's Rod and Deb at Right Truth....Three people with better name recognition than vanity candidate Duncan Hunter.
29 posted on
07/30/2007 1:43:18 PM PDT by
Petronski
(Just say no to Rudy McRomney.)
To: pissant
“Interesting” is your new word, I take it.
32 posted on
07/30/2007 1:47:33 PM PDT by
jdm
To: pissant
None of us know squat about FT. (whether you think you do or not)
When asked about his membership in CFR, he sidestepped the issue. The fact that he’s a member at all should give one pause. (more Bush, Clinton, etc)
Unless he gets in the race real soon and answers questions directed to him, to me, he’ll be just *more of the same*.
IMO,It’s in our best interest to avoid that at all cost. We’ve already seen to Repub party slip into the same insignificance as the *other* party.
63 posted on
07/30/2007 2:15:35 PM PDT by
wolfcreek
(2 bad Tyranny, Treachery and Treason never take a vacation...)
To: pissant
“As more and more of his potential supporters learn about Fred Thompson’s choice of open borders advocate and pro-Islamist ex-senator and lobbyist Spencer Abraham as his campaign manager, Thompson’s luster as th egreat GOP savior has begun to dim precipitously.”
This crap is getting tiresome. First of all, as has been pointed out several times, Abraham has been appointed as a campaign Co-Chair, not campaign manager. That is largely a symbolic position that has little influence on policy. How many times does it have to be pointed out that policy advisers are the one’s who help shape a campaign policy message. Secondly, even if he did have a role in policy, it does not mean that his role is related to security/WOT issues. He has a solid background on support for federalism and free market economics. When Fred picks someone like this to be his foreign policy adviser, wake me up. Until then find something with a little more substance.
75 posted on
07/30/2007 2:21:45 PM PDT by
rob777
(Personal Responsibility is the Price of Freedom)
To: pissant
Whooom...O’Really...Meltdown..well I suspect that some have ulterior motives and hidden agendas for bashing Fred.
82 posted on
07/30/2007 2:24:51 PM PDT by
OKIEDOC
(Kalifornia, a red state wannabe. I don't take Ex Lax I just read the New York Times.)
To: pissant
Latest to weigh in are Dymphna at Gates of Vienna, Elaine at Aaron's Rod ( who removed all the Blogs For Fred links to her site) and Deb at Right Truth. Who, who, and who?
112 posted on
07/30/2007 2:44:27 PM PDT by
r9etb
To: All
Another Trash Fred Thread of the Day from Pissant? Why bother.
Since his guy is sharing 4% at the bottom of the polls (I don't know how you can call this group 2nd tier) he has to be getting desperate. Oh, and Ann supports Duncan, Michelle likes Mitt and Debbie hates them all so far, so your theory don't dance to well either.
Remember we had a "DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS." picture around here somewhere?
121 posted on
07/30/2007 2:58:21 PM PDT by
Pistolshot
(Every woman, who can, should learn to shoot, and carry a gun.)
To: pissant
I must have missed the media event where Fred officially declared he was running for president.........
131 posted on
07/30/2007 3:06:01 PM PDT by
Squantos
(Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
To: pissant
I'm willing to give Fred the benefit of the doubt here. Keep in mind that Abraham rebuilt the Michigan GOP from scratch into a powerhouse in the late 80s. Even though he sucked as a Senator & bureaucrat, he's a great campaign operative. He'll give Fred the edge he needs in the Midwest states. I don't think Fred hired him for policy, if Fred's elected he's not going to be a part of his administration. Just for the duration of the campaign.
I'm not happy with the pick though (Fred should have picked Pat Toomey or Michael Steele, IMO) and it does suck, but I'll wait and see what develops.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson