Posted on 07/30/2007 12:59:48 PM PDT by pissant
As more and more of his potential supporters learn about Fred Thompson's choice of open borders advocate and pro-Islamist ex-senator and lobbyist Spencer Abraham as his campaign manager, Thompson's luster as th egreat GOP savior has begun to dim precipitously.
Latest to weigh in are Dymphna at Gates of Vienna, Elaine at Aaron's Rod ( who removed all the Blogs For Fred links to her site) and Deb at Right Truth.
And Michelle Malkin also did a short bit with Laura Ingraham on her national show.
As I said in my piece, no one who's serious about winning the War Against Jihad would want a tool like Abraham anywhere near him.Either Thompson was ignorant about Abraham's background, which means he lacks the judgment to be president, or he knew about it and appointed Abraham anyway...which means that no one who's serious about fighting this war or controlling the borders should remotely consider supporting him.
I think we're done with stealth candidates who talk the talk but don't walk the walk.
(Excerpt) Read more at joshuapundit.blogspot.com ...
LOl, give it up, CL.
Only to those who don't understand, or parse, the facts. You left out the part about "he won't be running anything".
It’s so awkward when you forget to READ, isn’t it? And it happens to you so frequently....
:) You don’t get it, child. I am not interested in what you have to say.
Of course not, when you’ve exposed yourself AGAIN.
Yah I mean when was the last time we saw one about the Duncan Hunter meltdown ? LOL.
Well, I can guarantee you that pissing on FRed or on the FReepers will do nothing for Hunter and will do nothing for you either, but might eventually get your account nuked if you keep it up. Suggest you try a different approach.
Bump!!
He was hired to help run a campaign not to influence Fred on policy. Until Fred nominates him for Secretary of State or National Security Advisor you have nothing to complain about.
You know, even if Hunter had been asked an unwanted question by Hannity, his debate skills have proven him time and again more than able to steer the discussion to his advantage.
Hunter's contributions to this presidential race are the important issues he wants to advance.
Are you claiming it did not happen?
“Raise a gun and scream “death to the CFR?”
Might be a nice start. Until he commits to the race, I’ll reserve my judgement.
B eatifully
U ttered ~
M uch
‘P reciated! “;^)
That’s hardly a suggestion I can refuse. LOL
But in all seriousness, how do you suggest that negative articles about Fred are treated here. I see many have been posted by Fredheads (usually with a barf alert) so they can counterattack the message. Michelle Malkin, Patterico, Ann Coulter and numerous bloggers who support other candidates are going to be firing at Fred (and Hunter for that matter). What do you suggest?
We can not be blind to what we are seeing.
Let's see what is the first post you always start the Fred attack with, I think it's "Interesting". But not near as interesting as the above.
Shhhhhhhhhh. They’re watching you!
Interesting, and as you can see, I’m trying to get the ground rules straight. If not for me, there would be alot fewer hundred post Fredthreads. LOL!!
We can not be blind to what we are seeing.
And you get this from where? Another FR member, who's also a former member of CFR (link to a post by them upthread by me) claims all this is just silly talk. So, where do you get this from?
“not look into the actual positions someone holds.”
I’m holding my judgement. I chose to back Hunter because he represents what I hold dear. What I know about FT is basically NADA. Another Hollywood actor who once was in Congress. Damn, I wish I could elect Sonny Bono. (sarc)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.