Posted on 07/14/2007 6:54:34 AM PDT by BubbaBasher
We were contacted today by a family in South Carolina who wanted to let us know they have officially BANNED the Romney's from consideration as adoptive "parents" for any of their new litter of adorable puppies.
I think this is a great idea. Does anybody else want to officially ban the Romney's from their adoption lists? Let us know.
Rusty
Shhhhh, you’re not allow to bring that up.
Just for the record, there are "animal activists" who would claim you were being cruel to your pet. If you slammed on the brakes, the dog would not be restrained and would fly through the window (unless, as they propose, you make sure your dog has a seat belt too.)
And as for people who's small pets ride in their laps duirng a car ride, a sudden stop, airbags deploy...bye, bye pet.
Our dogs ride unrestrained, but I know I've talked to a few "dog people" who thought we were being reckless. (main reason I'd like to restrain our Weims is they think they should be doing the driving and although they sit in the back, they'll often rest their head on the shoulder of the driver.)
Well, we have talked about a seat belt for her, but then she climbs over and falls asleep in Daddy’s lap. Awwwwww!
This isn't the kind of hit piece needed here, let his flip flopping record speak for itself.
My mother in law rides on top. The dog rides up front with me in the front passenger seat, wife and kids in the back.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.