Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: blogsforthompson.com
I'm confused on 9/14/1991 do they say they hire the firm or Fred... if you hire a firm why would you have in you minute not the name of the firm but name of one lawyer

The thing is it's nothing if true because as 10/10/1991 he's already hired for something else (mean he was looking before that mean he had no love of the job)....(hell I've done tel-com/computer work for some super hard core left wing wacko...a professional doesn't not ask a customers politics, it would be unethical to refuse a customer with a legit need for the serviced I provide on political grounds)

But if false and the left is manufacturing doc again... this sound like another lib half ass forgery to smear

29 posted on 07/08/2007 11:05:38 AM PDT by tophat9000 (My 2008 grassroots Republican platform: Build the fence, enforce the laws, and win the damm WAR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: tophat9000

“But if false and the left is manufacturing doc again.”
How about this from the New York Times ? It came up on the Google page this morning.

“The lawyer for a former White House aide told lawmakers Saturday that he expected the Bush administration to try to block the aide from testifying about the dismissals of 93 United States attorneys.”


48 posted on 07/08/2007 11:30:35 AM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ("Don't touch that thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson