As a follow-up to that. I’m aware there was a thread that essentially pitted Hunter & Thompson against eachother and the theme to some degree was that may the best win. I believe Jim Robinson remarked to that effect as well. I’d just like to note that as can be seen from above, I see them as equal with Conservatism, but not in electibility. With that said, I thought both candidates are winners with respect to Conservatism, so the both had already won. IMO, we can only find a stalemate with Hunter & Thompson. This is a great thing for Hunter, Thompson, FR and a great thing for Conservatism!
How can anyone make an educated decision on a candidate without comparing the records of the candidates?
That’s like the Senate asking their members to vote on the evil immigration bill without it even being written yet yesterday! (Diane wore yellow. Did anyone notice what color Nancy wore? Her usual “virginal white”? :) )
The Fredheads call citing records “bashing”. The only thing they can come up with against Hunter is “he can’t win”.
What was your old screen name?