Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance
I offered up very solid debatable points about what is without argument Fred's position vis a vis abortion, and you ignored them. What's up with that?

What I was talking about was that it's not a matter of debate whether Fred Thompson is a pro-lifer, but dishonest anklebiters continue to act as though he's a closet abortionist. I didn't mean no one should ever talkm about the parts of his record they don't like.

396 posted on 06/26/2007 9:05:32 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (Conviction and righteousness are force multipliers.--Freeper bert)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Silverback
Go ahead and back some also-ran instead of a man with an outstanding pro-life record and an articulate way of describing the crucial issues of life and death. If we end up with a pro-choicer for a nominee, don't come crying to me when he (or Hillary) appoints a couple of Supremes early in the first term and they're both pro-aborts. It's time for some of us in the pro-life community to grow up and realize that movements like this are about addition, not division and hair splitting.

That, sir, is political bullying. Face it. It's no different than the tactics the Giuliani supporters tried here for months.

Wake up and realize that conservatives by the droves are in no mood for any more of that crap.

But, if you must run away from this conversation, like you did yesterday, go for it. I don't care.

400 posted on 06/26/2007 9:09:38 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Democrats are the Evil Party, Republicans are the Stupid Party - So, "Bipartisan"=Stupid AND Evil!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 396 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson