Replies

I am not now, nor have I ever,defended ‘rob21’ or his comments.

You say you take issue with my statements, at least as it relates to ‘rob21’.

I have NEVER specifically mentioned him or his posts in any way.

I speak for me. I do not answer for anyone else. So please do not hold me accountable for the statements of others.

I am addressing a larger problem that I hope will be resolved amicably.

Will the Thompson supporters allow questions and debate regarding Fred and his ‘ past vs. present’ positions?

And will the Jim Robinson Administration allow debate?

Will the Thompson supporters allow questions and debate regarding Fred and his ‘ past vs. present’ positions?

Will the anti-Thompson folks concede the debates in light of the facts and evidence?

Or are you going to keep throwing more poop at the wall?

airborne, I have been very civil and very up front in my answers to your accusations. First of all, I was engaged with the original poster of this thread. I debated him very politely and also pointed out a few things that he was not aware of or chose to dismiss.

That is how people debate my FRiend. Now, you began this discussion with me, I have never associated you with Rob21. I do take issue with how you characterized my statements to Rob21, which by the way, were not addressed to you. I clearly made my case back to you without any insults and with actual quotes and facts, which you have chosen to ignore or pretend they don't exist.

It is YOU who needs to back off. And why you keep copying Jim Robinson on your messages to me is, well, suspicious. If JimRob has a problem with my posts, I'm sure he'll tell me.

Where in any of my posts do I not encourage debate or disallow questions?

Again, I'm not even a Thompson supporter, no more or less than I am a Duncan Hunter supporter.

If you would take the time to actually read all of my posts, you would see that to be the case.

Or are you just trying to pick a fight? Don't waste your time, or mine.

I just re-read your post and see that you were being very clever at best and deceptive at worst.

My reply to you said..."I must take issue with many of your statements, at least as it relates to my posts and replies to Rob21. "

You chose to delete the "my posts and replies" and tried to make it seem like I was accusing you of something by saying..."You say you take issue with my statements, at least as it relates to ‘rob21’."

Very tricky. Nice try.