Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who Will Be Fred Thompson’s VP?
Who Will Be Fred Thompson’s VP? ^ | 6/04/2007 | The New Pundit

Posted on 06/04/2007 8:54:37 AM PDT by TheNewPundit

Now that Thompson has wrapped up the GOP nomination, the question on everyone's mind is who he will pick to be his running mate. I know we are still months away from the primaries. I am also aware that Fred hasn't actually announced his bid. But let's be honest, he is going to run and he is going to win. He is the most popular Republican in the race, despite the fact he isn't officially in the race.

The Presidential race is more about popularity than politics. Why do you think the two current front-runners are also the most liberal? Rudy and McCain are popular because of their past. The other candidates don't have the same history. Romney is doing well because he knows marketing, or someone on his team knows marketing. But the rest of the candidates, despite their conservative values, have very low poll numbers. Just don't tell the Ron Paul "truthers" that I said that. Internet polls that allow you to vote 100 times don't count, ok.

Fred is popular, mostly because of his time on the television, which interestingly enough started when he played himself. This led to some great movie rolls, and of course his current roll as a conservative prosecutor. All of this has increased his popularity amongst conservatives and has made him a favorite with conservative pundits and blogs. Some trivia for you, part of his inspiration to run was Dick Wolf, the guy who put together the many Law and Order shows.

So, again, now that he has this thing wrapped up, who will he pick as his running mate? We have seen in the past where the candidate picks a former foe from the primaries. There is some speculation that Fred will pick one of the current candidates. Steve Elliott of grassfire.org is expecting a younger governor, thinking that two senators won't play well in the fight against Barack O'Clinton. This is a very good point, especially given the recent record for senators against governors in the presidential race.

I won't speculate myself, but I will tell you what to look for. Look for polls, transformed into pairing people up with running mates. An example: Would you vote for Hillary/Obama or Thompson/Romney or Thompson/Tancredo?

Fred is running because fictional polls that included himself and Newt put the both of them well above other candidates. Fred played this so that he would know whether or not to actually run. He wanted to be certain that the people were tired of the front-running RINOs. And we are tired of them. Fred will find out who makes the best ticket, and he will start this process very soon.

I'm not sure that he can win it all right now. Republicans are very angry, mostly about amnesty, I mean "Comprehensive Immigration Reform"; I mean amnesty. I don't know if this can be saved, but with his popularity, maybe he is the guy who can do it. The pick for VP will play a very important factor here. The democrats will do the same, we could even see another Clinton/Gore ticket believe it or not. My guess is that it will be Clinton/Obama.

Don't screw it up Fred, the country can't afford it right now.


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: elections; fredthompson; president
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last
To: higgmeister

Thanks.


41 posted on 06/04/2007 2:03:12 PM PDT by Silly (http://www.paulklenk.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: word_warrior_bob
Bret Schundler

Great call!

42 posted on 06/04/2007 2:24:40 PM PDT by jmc813 (The 2nd Amendment is NOT a "social conservative" issue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Sturm Ruger
I think Fred will choose someone who is Black simply because Hillary is likely to pick Obama.

I disagree that we will face a Clinton/Obama ticket simply because while Obama may be many things, stupid isn't one of them. He knows that with Clinton's negatives she has to be considered somewhat of a long shot to win. If she does then he enters 2012 without the baggage of being the former second-banana on a losing ticket, status that hasn't done Lieberman or Edwards a whole lot of good. Should Clinton win the nomination then I think Obama will thank her very much for her offer but respectfully decline. Then he'll go out and campaign his ass off for her so that should she lose then he can't be blamed for it. If she does lose then he's positioned to run in 2012 as an experienced Senator. If she wins then it's 2016 and he's no worse off than if he had taken the Veep spot. Either way he's probably Senator for Life from Illinois so he doesn't have to sweat his re-election campaigns. He can pretty much phone it in and spend a lot of time campaigning for others and building up Brownie points. Every other Democrat candidate realizes that it's now or never for them. Obama is the only one with time.

43 posted on 06/04/2007 3:01:08 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: jellybean; carlo3b; girlangler; KoRn; Shortstop7; Lunatic Fringe; Darnright; babygene; pitbully; ...
PING!!

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Fredipedia: The Definitive Fred Thompson Reference

Please FReepmail jellybean if you want on/off this list. WARNING: This ping list is EXTREMELY active.

44 posted on 06/04/2007 6:39:58 PM PDT by Politicalmom ("Secure the border first. This is our house and we get to decide who gets to come here"- FDT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Sturm Ruger
Alaska Gov Sarah Palin maybe ?

FRED THOMPSON /SARAH PALIN 08


45 posted on 06/04/2007 6:44:54 PM PDT by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Squantos

My guesses: #1 Romney, #2 McCain, #3 Talent


46 posted on 06/04/2007 7:30:54 PM PDT by RobFromGa (FDT/TBD in 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: hardback; rob777
Zell would be awesome and so would J.C. Watts but they're Southerners like Fred. I'd be happy with either but how about Thomas Sowell of Stanford U. in California? He is a brilliant Economist and Black Conservative.
47 posted on 06/04/2007 8:44:01 PM PDT by no dems ( Dear God, how much longer are you going to let Ted Kennedy and Robert Byrd live?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Squantos
Uh oh. I can't let your pick be in bigger letters than mine:

FRED THOMPSON/THOMAS SOWELL
48 posted on 06/04/2007 8:46:17 PM PDT by no dems ( Dear God, how much longer are you going to let Ted Kennedy and Robert Byrd live?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: TheNewPundit
Well, I take issue with the, oft repeated, "he's only well known because he's an actor" line.

I haven't ever seen one of his movies, except the skit I just received..."The Last Best Chance". The one time I caught a glimpse of him on L&O, we switched it off...L&O isn't L&O for us, without Lenny.

Most of the people I try to hawk FRed to, don't even know who he is until I mention "Red October", then they say..."Oh, yeah, that guy, he's a politician?"

So, please, stop with the condescending crap, and judge FRed on his merits, and history, as a politician and government servant, not on his popularity as an actor.

Thank you. BTW, I would like to see JC Watts as FRed's VP selection, even though in all honesty, it's way too soon to get that "deep in the woods" tm FDT.

:O)

P
America. Together. Again
Fred Thompson/JC Watts in '08

49 posted on 06/04/2007 8:53:01 PM PDT by papasmurf (<<<<< Click there to see my dogs! Oh, and I have FRed one liners, too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

Great graphic!


50 posted on 06/04/2007 9:34:46 PM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: TheNewPundit

Fred Thompson/John Bolton 2008


51 posted on 06/04/2007 11:22:03 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Fred Thompson/John Bolton 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems
“I’d be happy with either but how about Thomas Sowell of Stanford U. in California? He is a brilliant Economist and Black Conservative.”




He is a brilliant, but I doubt that he would be interested. An interesting possibility though.

52 posted on 06/05/2007 4:05:33 AM PDT by rob777 (Personal Responsibility is the Price of Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: TheNewPundit

Fred’s veep? Chuck Norris!


53 posted on 06/05/2007 9:56:46 AM PDT by Graymatter (FREDeralist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sturm Ruger
A Thompson - Steele ticket would be a formidable one, IMO

That sir is the right answer, or perhaps a Thompson- Herman Cain ticket. Both are good men, and you would not be going wrong with either one.

54 posted on 06/05/2007 10:11:54 AM PDT by cpdiii (Pharmacist, Pilot, Geologist, Oil Field Trash and proud of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: rob777
He is a brilliant, but I doubt that he would be interested. An interesting possibility though

Sowell would be brilliant as Secretary of Education.

55 posted on 06/05/2007 10:13:40 AM PDT by cpdiii (Pharmacist, Pilot, Geologist, Oil Field Trash and proud of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom
Now, we're a long way away from this point yet, because we don't know which factors would be most important, but in Thompson's case, the most likely factors from the above list seem to be (again, in no particular order): geographical balance, demographic balance, capable backup, and heir apparent.

Agreed. I think it will be Tim Pawlenty, who could very likely bring at least MN with him, and possibly bring a couple other midwestern states as well.

56 posted on 06/05/2007 10:14:08 AM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii
“Sowell would be brilliant as Secretary of Education.”




If I remember right, he was offered that position in the Reagan Administration and declined when he realized that the administration had no intention of following through on its campaign pledge to eliminate the Department of Education.

57 posted on 06/05/2007 10:46:05 AM PDT by rob777 (Personal Responsibility is the Price of Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: K-oneTexas

I just want to watch Zell in a veep debate against Richardson or another dumbocrat. It would be must see TV!


58 posted on 06/06/2007 2:40:19 PM PDT by hardback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson