[JLS]

Another reversal awaiting the 9th. In most if not all federal housing laws their is a threshhold number of units one has to rent.

If this idiot judge really said, “In an ideal world, housing arrangements would be handled by an impartial government agency,” Bube suggested. “People would be assigned appropriate living quarters and room mates like they are in the Army or prison. Prejudice and discrimination would play no part. We’d cure the urban sprawl that is caused by people determined to live in their own separate single-family home.” It really should be a warning to all those around here who see no difference between the two major political parties.

[tet68]

AZC bump.

[dynachrome]

” Firms with a disproportionate under-representation of the short and fat”
LOL

Short and fat dynachrome approves.

[Quix]

Globalist idiots.

[dynachrome]

p.s. I think the Colorado one is funnier. Of course, having Bill Ritter as guvnor ain’t so funny!

[festus]

Well it may not be the judge thats out of line here.

It might just well be that the law is just really badly worded and doesn’t allow for roomate selection in a manner that most would view ok.

[rockrr]

“In an ideal world, housing arrangements would be handled by an impartial government agency...”

John, have you noticed how easily you slip into the Dhimmi perspective? Almost like second nature. I'd keep an eye on that if I were you...;'}

[Revel]

This has to be like an Onion piece right?

[freekitty]

In other words, we can’t have the great unwashed masses actually talking with each other. We have to keep them apart. They may find out what we say are lies.

[Notwithstanding]

This is an ill-fated, ham-handed, and hilarious (if it weren’t real) attempt to end-run a re-definition of gender discrimiation so as to now include discirmination based on “sexual orientation”.

It may be that CA law does apply to both, but fed law does NOT.

And it seems that state laws that hinder internet commerce, which is interstate commerce, would be invalidated to the extent they do effect interstate commerce, as they would if such laws disallowed people in NJ from using the website to advertise for a straight roommate in NJ.

Likewise, the supreme court will not support outlawing a woman’s ability to avoid having a man as a roommate.

[airborne]

Oh, I thought you meant a real court.

It's just the flamers in 'Frisco.

8^p