To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Tail attempts to wag dog.
2 posted on
05/16/2007 4:41:07 PM PDT by
unspun
(What do you think? Please think, before you answer.)
The Ron paul version of "freep this pole".
[what a weird sounding phrase]
Should we around here reply to LGF with, "so what?", or "good for them"?
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Even if they werent doing this pathetic maneuver to artificially pump up Pauls support, Id very seriously consider removing him anyway, because I found his remarks last night about 9/11 insulting and dangerous, and highly offensive.
I like Ron Paul and agree with him on most constitutional issues but his comments last night could have come from an ANSWER rally. To blame American policies for terrorism is simply moronic. The islamderthals have been consistently doing the same thing for the last thousand years to anyone they came into contact with. Burying our heads in the sand isn't going to make them go away.
4 posted on
05/16/2007 4:43:35 PM PDT by
cripplecreek
(Greed is NOT a conservative ideal.)
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
I listened to Paul during the debate and was thinking this guy may have something on the ball until his disastrous remarks right out of a George Sorass fringe bash America meeting.
Paul is running for president in the wrong party.
He needs to contact Michael Moore and get with his program.
5 posted on
05/16/2007 4:51:25 PM PDT by
OKIEDOC
(Kalifornia, DUNCAN 08, ELECTION 2008, MOST IMPORTANT OF MY LIFE TIME)
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
It doesn’t have to be a supporter of his as much as any dimocrat in general would want to poll for him.
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
I doubt that they are Paul supporters, more like moonbats just causing a ruckus to prop up a low-tier candidate as to harass the high-tier candidates at this time.
8 posted on
05/16/2007 5:52:29 PM PDT by
quantim
(2008 => I'll take an imperfect winner over a perfect loser.)
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
It appears the Rudy people got smarter and ran around voting in polls. Note the totals for the LGF poll has more than twice the number of votes as the 1st debate.
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
I think Johnson is making a mistake.
It is true that such online polls are not “scientific.”
However, I think that “intensity” can be seen by such a thing as spamming a poll.
In short, the message I get from their spamming efforts for Paul indicate that his supporters are fired up.
Is that useful info? Yep.
10 posted on
05/16/2007 7:22:44 PM PDT by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
I wouldn’t mind if that happened here on FR, but then that’s going a bit far...
11 posted on
05/16/2007 7:24:33 PM PDT by
Kevmo
(Duncan Hunter just needs one Rudy G Campaign Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVBtPIrEleM)
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Campaigning for votes is not acceptable to Little Green Footballs.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson