Posted on 05/16/2007 11:35:36 AM PDT by West Coast Conservative
It seems he simply has decided what ever he feels is reality and any and all facts that do not conform to his rabidly ignorant world view he simply ignores.
He is our version of Al Sharpton or Dennis Kucinich. He has NO business running for President or even being in the US Congress.
Isn’t it too late for him to enter the primary? I’m afraid he’s going to need an effective write-in campaign.
The destruction of RuPaul’s political career is beginning.
This guy is known in Texas RLC circles to be a blowhard fool.
People there will not pay him any attention as I understand.
I can’t wait until the Paul bearers come out on this thread!
And he's running against Ron Paul? How will anyone tell the difference?
It's like the Iran-Iraq war: Is there a way they both can lose?
Interesting.
LOL.
Ron Paul is a necessary antidote to both the Trent Lotts on one side, and the Lieberman/Giussolini types on the other. I may not agree with him on foreign policy but view Ron Paul as essential to domestic policy as Tancredo is on immigration policy.
I agree.
I’m a Mitt supporter (I really believe he can win).
And I am so disappointed I missed the debate last night. Can someone clear it up for me?
What reason did Ron Paul give for Al Qaeda attacking the World Trade Center?
And what is the correct answer?
LOL
Dondero is a hack who has been peddling “Libertarians for Giuliani” for quite some time now. Libertarians for Giuliani is an oxymoron.
Apparently, Giuliani never read it. He was too busy funding Planned Parenthood, seizing private firearms, cheating on his wife, and hitting the town in drag.
God help us.
RP: "They attack us because we've been over there. We've
been bombing Iraq for 10 years. ... We've been in the
Middle East..."
RP: "I'm suggesting that we listen to the people who attacked
us and the reason they did it..."
Where's the "lie?" If Y occurs in the presence of X, and Y does not occur in the absence of X, THEN X CAUSES Y. If Paul says Jihadis attacked the US on 9/11 because of US actions, and they would not have attacked the US on 9/11 in the absence of these actions, then he is saying US (actions) caused 9/11. Seems simple enough - but then Isolationism, like Pacifism, is a delusion disorder. Its symptoms are pointless distinctions and meaningless nuances, all as a substitute for action and a rational for inaction in the face of imminent life threatening danger.
And if you checked my posts you'd see I've only said unfavorable things about Giuliani and have not posted on Paul at all until now (8/15/07). The picture merely made the point that Paul's position put him in agreement with Chavez and Ahmadinejad - which is a fact.
Now seeing that Paul and many of his supporters think and talk like Noam Chomsky, Michael Moore and Bill Maher, and especially seeing the mindless Democrat-like attacks any criticism of him provokes from those same supporters, I'll have to make a point of posting against him as much as possible.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.