To: 4woodenboats; lilycicero; RedRover
So this 1st Sgt. Albert Espinosa thought an investigation should have been done because he was involved with an investigation in 2003 when a 12 year old Iraqi girl was killed. His experience was such, that when one civilian was killed, an investigation happened. I assume the platoon members would have a hodge-podge of backgrounds - various time frames in Iraq, various regions, various experiences. I'm also assuming he was called by the prosecution.
From the article, Gittins also said a regimental commander had determined that the civilians deaths were "collateral damage" and that no investigation was necessary. The defense attorney's statement.... went unchallenged by prosecutors.
This would have been a reference to Huck's assistant, regimental commander Col. R. Gary Sokoloski, who allegedely approved the rewording of the incident for the press release, and has now refused to testify.
139 posted on
05/09/2007 3:56:31 PM PDT by
Girlene
To: Girlene
I’ll bet you would be an expert marksman if you were a Marine.
141 posted on
05/09/2007 4:19:13 PM PDT by
freema
(Marine FRiend, 1stCuz2xRemoved, Mom, Aunt, Sister, Friend, Wife, Daughter, Niece)
To: Girlene
I don’t think Col. Sokoloski was a regimental commander. He was chief of staff to the division commander—so that’d be division level. But I’m not sure how things stood at the time of the incident.
150 posted on
05/10/2007 8:03:18 AM PDT by
RedRover
(Defend Our Marines)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson