[freema]

I don't think the NCIS considered the Iraqi witnesses suspects, and so would have no need for an interrogation. They would need to interview their witness, but wouldn't need to resort to tactics to get an answer out of them.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1822199/posts?page=42#42

You mean like calling our Marines Cold-Blooded Murderers?

Fundamentally, that's irrelevant to the case. It might be relevant if you can demonstrate unlawful command influence (but that will be tricky!). The only purpose that this press release exists, however, is to stir up outrage that the Marines were interrogated.

Fundamentally, it's not in the least irrelevant to the case. The only purpose that Marines were called Cold-Blooded Murderers by a member of the United States House of Representatives was WHAT?

[jude24]

The only purpose that Marines were called Cold-Blooded Murderers by a member of the United States House of Representatives was WHAT?

What Murtha said is irrelevant in the court proceedings, with the sole exception of a command-influence motion.