Posted on 04/24/2007 8:31:32 AM PDT by RedRover
* March 11: An Honest Investigation Would Have Cleared Lieutenant Pantano in Iraq
* February 7: Gen. Tom McInerney: Haditha Defendants' Rights Violated
* February 6: NCIS must record interviews [Hamdania and Haditha Marines]
* January 31: Attorney: Accused Camp Pendleton Marine didn't get fair hearing [Hamdania-Related]
No, they were treated much worse!
This case is falling apart faster than Hilary’s last facelift. Murda tried to make it into Me Lie and couldn’t find any other liars.
Pray for W and Our Marines
Race, I forwarded this to flightline.
I can't get over it.
An investigation of these allegations is imperative.
Thought this would get you out of the dumps!
“Thompson concluded, “This entire investigation has been nothing but a political witchhunt instigated by insurgent propaganda operatives, anti-war media, and anti-war politicians.”
**************
Truer words have never been written. We can also thank the semi-fake vets of Iraq Vets Against the War for chipping in their moral indignation at the Marines involved in the Haditha incident.
Not illegal. Happens all the time, even in civilian courts.
Many witnesses reported that the questioning was accusatorial, confrontational, and at times insulting. One officer stated that agents yelled and threw things at him during his questioning.
Interrogations are like that.
This is a piece designed to whip up hysteria. There's not much substance there. Legally, the Haditha Marines' best defense is lack of specific intent to commit any unlawful acts, but that they acted reasonably and consistently with their training. These ancillary issues are mere distractions.
...”Interrogations are like that. “
Jude24, do you seriously think NCIS interrrogated the possible Iraqi witnesses like this? From some of the articles I read, Iraqis seemed quite pleased by all the attention that NCIS gave to them and the “investigation”.
...”This is a piece designed to whip up hysteria. There’s not much substance there. “...
You mean like calling our Marines Cold-Blooded Murderers?
I don't think the NCIS considered the Iraqi witnesses suspects, and so would have no need for an interrogation. They would need to interview their witness, but wouldn't need to resort to tactics to get an answer out of them.
Interrogations never are pleasant experiences. This is universal, whether they are performed by the local police officer or the NCIS.
You mean like calling our Marines Cold-Blooded Murderers?
Fundamentally, that's irrelevant to the case. It might be relevant if you can demonstrate unlawful command influence (but that will be tricky!). The only purpose that this press release exists, however, is to stir up outrage that the Marines were interrogated.
This article is Exhibit A why I would never, ever allow the Thomas More Law Center to defend me if my neck were on the line. There are other defense attorneys, military and civilian, who are involved in this whole mess that are acting far more responsibly. These guys are expending far too much energy, time, and resources on a dubious piece of PR.
Granted, a more evident case could be built against NCIS misconduct in the Hamdania investigation. Now that Alan Dershowitz is involved with Hamdania, that may happen.
Alleged NCIS misconduct should be as troubling to JAGs as anyone, of course. Shoddy or improper police work can undermine a case.
BTW, this is the thread I hoped you join: Bastards and Men of Honor [FReeper comments needed]
An historical note. John Kerry's Winter Soldier buddies (back in the day when you still just a gleam in Pa Warmonger's eye) supported clemency for Lt. Calley on the basis that the true guilty parties were never punished.
Girl, I think our friend jude is an Honorable Man.
I see we are back to the magical number15!
I don't really agree with that.
These issues could cause the case to get dismissed. When a joint force commanding general claims there was extreme command influence and the case should be dismissed because the troops can't get a fair trial, that is more than mere distraction. It is part of an all out media war with the intent of getting the case dropped ahead of time.
It is not a distraction when one is asked for a lawyer and the lawyer is not provided. The issue, of course, is proving that. NCIS is not required to tape their sessions as the other military services do. Actually, though, that will give the benefit of the doubt to the defendants, I'd think.
And finally, if it is provable that accused were not permitted to relieve themselves, then that is a serious charge in the information campaign to free these men.
And 15 human shield civilian plus 9 insurgents equals 24 Iraqis. Not 24 “innocent civilians”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.