Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Don't arrest, invest | What could marijuana decriminalization buy us? About $10.1 billion
The Prometheus Institute ^ | 4/20/2007 | Justin Hartfield

Posted on 04/20/2007 5:56:08 AM PDT by tang0r

Jeffery A. Miron finds that by decriminalizing cannabis, the federal government would generate $2.4 billion in federal tax revenue annually, and that an additional $7.7 billion would be saved as the cost of incarceration, policing, and processing offenders. Now, that's too much money to for the human brain to fully conceptualize, given the air quality around April 20th, so your friends at the Prometheus Institute have provided this handy quantitive index in order show exactly how much the U.S. can earn each year from cannabis decriminalization. The math: $2.4 billion per year + $7.7 billion per year = $10.1 billion gained in total per year. You're welcome.

The $10.1 billion dollars could, for those who are interested, do any of the following:

• Subsidize a school voucher system for half of the U.S., for good reason • Build three nuclear reactors, because Greenpeace will be high and won't notice • Extend health insurance to one million uninsured Americans, and doesn't that make everyone happy? • Purchase eight Stealth Bombers, or 2 Minitz class aircraft carriers, because we can

(Excerpt) Read more at prometheusinstitute.net ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: bongbrigade; decriminalization; drugs; marijuana; weed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

1 posted on 04/20/2007 5:56:10 AM PDT by tang0r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tang0r
Now, that's too much money to for the human brain to fully conceptualize

It's even harder when you are stoned.

2 posted on 04/20/2007 5:58:53 AM PDT by uptoolate (If it sounds absurd, 51% chance it was sarcasm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tang0r

I’m having a lot of trouble choosing between the B-2’s and the aircraft carriers, although I’m leaning towards the carriers.


3 posted on 04/20/2007 5:58:59 AM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (How do I change my screen name after Harper's election?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tang0r

More short term memory loss.


4 posted on 04/20/2007 5:59:48 AM PDT by SouthTexas (Man made global warming is a man made LIE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tang0r

Did they figure in the cost of drug rehab increased crime from dead heads etc?


5 posted on 04/20/2007 6:02:09 AM PDT by bilhosty (Rudy in '08, Jindal in '16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tang0r

Never fly. too many politicians and cops are profiting from the “Bonus System” of drug money.


6 posted on 04/20/2007 6:02:12 AM PDT by Seruzawa (Attila the Hun... wasn't he a liberal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa
"Never fly. too many politicians and cops are profiting from the “Bonus System” of drug money."

That, and the fact that the so-called "war on drugs" enables the federal government to exert more and more influence and control of police activities down to the smallest local level.

The ugly truth is that the "war on drugs" isn't about keeping the public safe, or promoting health, or any other tired platitude -- it's about CONTROL, plain and simple.

Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!

7 posted on 04/20/2007 6:04:41 AM PDT by Joe Brower (Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: uptoolate
It's even harder when you are stoned.

Someone who is stoned or impaired in some other form should only be prosecuted if they pose a threat to others. These prosecutions can happen under existing laws. If someone wants to get stoned just for the sake of getting stoned and they do not pose a threat to others in the process, that should be nobody's business but their own. If such a person puts his/her own job at risk by doing that... well tough!

If we took even half of the resources we waste every second on the War on Drugs (which we WILL never win), we could significantly reduce real crime in this country.

8 posted on 04/20/2007 6:04:56 AM PDT by pnh102
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tang0r

dudes...what about anti-smoking laws ?
you sell me marijuana but wont let me take a toke ?
bummer.


9 posted on 04/20/2007 6:07:07 AM PDT by stylin19a (If you are living on the edge...MOVE OVER ! Some of us are ready to jump !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tang0r
Happy 420!!!
10 posted on 04/20/2007 6:07:25 AM PDT by the_devils_advocate_666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tang0r
"Miron finds that by decriminalizing cannabis, the federal government would generate $2.4 billion in federal tax revenue annually"

About the same amount owed by IRS employees who refuse to file tax forms.

11 posted on 04/20/2007 6:08:02 AM PDT by brotherWesUpNorth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tang0r

Doesn’t the idea of making nature against the law seem to you a bit paranoid?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jSH6ofHbeUw


12 posted on 04/20/2007 6:08:07 AM PDT by D-Chivas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian
I’m having a lot of trouble choosing between the B-2’s and the aircraft carriers, although I’m leaning towards the carriers.

You can't have a very good tailgate party on a B2. But on a Nimitz you can have that and the football game, too.

13 posted on 04/20/2007 6:09:13 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tang0r
the federal government would generate $2.4 billion in federal tax revenue annually

How?

Marijuana can be grown in virtually every state, either indoors or outdoors. Those who use pot will prefer to buy it through home grown sources rather than subsidize the government by buying government packaged joints.

Thus they are setting up the need for an enforcement agency to go after the backyarder's. Is this cost deducted from the 2.4 Billion?

14 posted on 04/20/2007 6:09:53 AM PDT by Michael.SF. (In this (political) War, Republicans are gutless appeasers. -- Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
The ugly truth is that the "war on drugs" isn't about keeping the public safe, or promoting health, or any other tired platitude -- it's about CONTROL, plain and simple.

Bingo.

It'll never happen folks. Too much power and money flowing into the hands of too many people.

15 posted on 04/20/2007 6:12:34 AM PDT by Wormwood (Future Former Freeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: uptoolate

Right. Will anyone be working a full brain capacity?


16 posted on 04/20/2007 6:12:41 AM PDT by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bilhosty
Did they figure in the cost of drug rehab increased crime from dead heads etc?

That's an already-existing cost. There is no evidence that illegal drug use would go up, as mainly those who want to use are using anyway right now.

Crime by definition would go down, as you've now defined things as not being a crime. But the peripheral crimes of those criminals would go down because they are no longer criminals. For example, they don't have to launder money anymore. Also, prices would go down even with taxation, reducing crimes committed to get money for drugs.

17 posted on 04/20/2007 6:13:04 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
The ugly truth is that the "war on drugs" isn't about keeping the public safe, or promoting health, or any other tired platitude -- it's about CONTROL, plain and simple.

Many people are making obscene amounts of money by keeping marijuana illegal - always follow the money trail - and you will see very many hypocrites.

18 posted on 04/20/2007 6:13:20 AM PDT by alicewonders (I like Duncan Hunter for President in 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: uptoolate
Once it becomes a major industry that lobbies and pays heavily into candidates campaigns like the tobacco and alcohol industries do, it will be loved an accepted by the Republican party. After all, it’s all about personal freedom, isn’t it?
19 posted on 04/20/2007 6:15:51 AM PDT by Dixie Yooper (Ephesians 6:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tang0r
Build three nuclear reactors, because Greenpeace will be high and won't notice


20 posted on 04/20/2007 6:16:49 AM PDT by absolootezer0 (stop repeat offenders - don't re-elect them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson