To: WayneLusvardi
To: WayneLusvardi
To: WayneLusvardi; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; honolulugal; gruffwolf; ...
Click on POGW graphic for full GW rundown
Ping me if you find one I've missed.
6 posted on
03/25/2007 6:21:13 AM PDT by
xcamel
(Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
To: WayneLusvardi
The older CO2 measurements are thought to be inaccurate due to the scientific instruments used, improper procedures etc.
To: neverdem; xcamel; WayneLusvardi
Sobering: I did NOT realize that "global warming" theorists had been so fixed in their methods and prejudices as early as the 1940's and 1950's!
8 posted on
03/25/2007 8:09:42 AM PDT by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: WayneLusvardi
Good article. Here is another paper that questions pre-industrial CO2 levels as measured from ice cores. Essentially, it says that at deep depths, the ice bubbles are under pressure, and that the drilling process is vulnerable to the escape of portions of the gases as they are being brought to the surface where the pressure is much less. Here is the article:
Climate Change: Incorrect information on pre-industrial CO2
To: blam; FairOpinion; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 24Karet; 3AngelaD; 49th; ...
12 posted on
03/26/2007 10:49:43 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(I last updated my profile on Saturday, March 24, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
from 2001:
The Atmospheric CO2 and Temperature Records
of Dome Concordia, Antarctica
the "main feature" of their CO2 record is the 40% increase from a mean value of 189 ppm around 17,000 years ago to a mean value of 265 ppm around 11,000 ago. Furthermore, close examination of the rise in temperature and atmospheric CO2 concentration at the end of the last glacial maximum (based upon a linear fit of the data) revealed the increase in temperature took place at 17,800 ± 300 years ago, while the increase in CO2 took place at 17,000 ± 200 years ago. On this basis, the authors conclude that "the start of the CO2 increase thus lagged the start of the [temperature] increase by 800 ± 600 years."
13 posted on
03/26/2007 10:55:49 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(I last updated my profile on Saturday, March 24, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: 75thOVI; AFPhys; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; Avoiding_Sulla; BenLurkin; Berosus; Brujo; ...
14 posted on
03/26/2007 10:56:30 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(I last updated my profile on Saturday, March 24, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: WayneLusvardi
science may yet triumph on this issue.
here's hoping
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson