Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rudy 1, Romney 0
Eye on 08 ^ | 3/6/07

Posted on 03/06/2007 8:25:19 AM PST by areafiftyone

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-197 last
To: WOSG

See also:
http://race42008.com/2007/03/03/romneys-speech-bedrock-conservatism/


181 posted on 03/06/2007 5:28:51 PM PST by WOSG (The 4-fold path to save America - Think right, act right, speak right, vote right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

Reality -- Romney paid transportion and entry fees for a lot of college and high school students to be there so naturally he won. Rudy had a total of seven staffers and no presence to speak of.

When you buy a victory, it doesn't mean much because Romney couldn't even come in 1st when you combine votes for 1st and 2nd which Rudy won.


182 posted on 03/06/2007 6:14:09 PM PST by PhiKapMom (Broken Glass Republican -- RudyforPresident2008@yahoogroups.com or http://www.rudygforamerica.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: EndWelfareToday

LoL. I figured as much. Go off howling in the wilderness.


183 posted on 03/06/2007 7:32:48 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Defeat Hillary's V'assed Left Wing Conspiracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

As if I need the opinions of reporters to know what happened when I heard the speech that Rudy gave and saw the response of the audience which had repeated interruptions of agreement.

If the Rudyphobes were correct he should have been received with hisses and boos if not cries of "FAG LOVER" since such is apparently what determines a "true" conservative to some around here.

So Romney got a double. That is no exaggeration but Rudy did at least as well. I never said his tactics were unfair or underhanded so I don't know where that came from. In fact, I haven't said that Romney did not do well in this whole episode. Romney, Rudy and Newt were the clear winners here probably the last two did best. Rudy because this was a hotbed of conservatives and Newt because his Coy Maiden tactic seems to be working as well. Powerline is also incorrect in claiming Romney took any hits of late. He has not.


184 posted on 03/06/2007 7:40:32 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Defeat Hillary's V'assed Left Wing Conspiracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: lormand

But a demented man rarely is. Or a total tool.


185 posted on 03/06/2007 7:42:03 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Defeat Hillary's V'assed Left Wing Conspiracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: gpapa

"There are better alternatives." Who?


186 posted on 03/06/2007 7:43:05 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Defeat Hillary's V'assed Left Wing Conspiracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

Anybody except Rudy, Mitt & McPain


187 posted on 03/06/2007 8:04:31 PM PST by gpapa (Boost FR Traffic! Make FR your home page!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

"In fact, I haven't said that Romney did not do well in this whole episode."

Then I'm not sure what you are complaining about. Others have tried to imply that Romney's straw poll win was not legitimate was why I replied. A win is a win.


"If the Rudyphobes were correct he should have been received with hisses and boos ..." Just because you like other candidates above Rudy doesn't make you a 'Rudyphobe' ... are you a Hunter-phobe???


188 posted on 03/06/2007 8:11:37 PM PST by WOSG (The 4-fold path to save America - Think right, act right, speak right, vote right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader

I care plenty about family values. Just not phoney, sickly sentimental pandering.

On the other hand, we live in a dangerous world, and I'll support the divorced Guiliani over any other candidate - ex-wives or no ex-wives.


189 posted on 03/07/2007 5:18:05 AM PST by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Of course, Clinton was the master of phoney, awful fake "family values." Remember the State of the Union address during Monica when he mouthed the words "Ah Luv Y-ooo!" to Miss Hillary in the gallery?


190 posted on 03/07/2007 5:20:10 AM PST by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

EWWWWWWWW! I remember!


191 posted on 03/07/2007 5:30:24 AM PST by areafiftyone (RUDY GIULIANI 2008 - STRENGTH AND LEADERSHIP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: gpapa

That means NOBODY. One does not get to create the Perfect Politician one only gets to chose from those available.

And there are FEW from those available who could actually win the nomination and beat Hillary.


192 posted on 03/07/2007 7:03:21 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Defeat Hillary's V'assed Left Wing Conspiracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

Since when is analysing the true meaning of this "victory" complaining. It was significant until one actually looks below the surface after than it is seen as hollow and contrived with little true significance actually obscuring what the message of the convention really was.

I have repeatedly said that I would vote for Hunter should a miracle happen and he become the nominee. The Rudyphobic have just as repeatedly said they will NOT vote for him.

The only thing I have against Duncan is that he has NO chance to win the nomination.


193 posted on 03/07/2007 7:07:23 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Defeat Hillary's V'assed Left Wing Conspiracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Another thread by the "Fifteen Percent"


194 posted on 03/07/2007 7:08:37 AM PST by Afronaut (Supporting Republican Liberals is the Undeniable End to Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

there you go again. I diagree with your opinion that Romney's victory is 'hollow and contrived', and consider it whining to assert so, as any straw poll has these known dynamics. They are what they are. Let's move on.

I will vote for whoever the GOP nominee is, so dont need over the top appelations thrown at me. It is circular logic to oppose Hunter as 'not able to win the nomination'. Vote for the best candidate and see where the chips fall. Rudy is the one candidate who doesnt need the votes of thinking activists, he's got the celebrity advantage.

Support the best candidate - period. IMHO, it's not Rudy.


195 posted on 03/07/2007 9:10:14 AM PST by WOSG (The 4-fold path to save America - Think right, act right, speak right, vote right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

1) I have never said I would not vote for Hunter should he survive until the Illinois primary. I have repeatedly said I may very well do that and that I like the guy.

There is no circular logic in my analysis of political realities nor is it even that concerned with Hunter per se.

NO hard rightist would have a prayer of being elected president. The electorate has by scared off by the Treason Media's lies about what conservatism is. That was clearly illustrated by the Nov election and the conservative wipe out therein.

My "support" for Rudy has been limited to urging people to get behind the GOP nominee and trying to limit the damage intended by the Rudyphobic many of whom aren't even Republicans. These people will damage the party if not responded to and are not helping conservatism regain credibility. Quite the contrary they are driving people away by making it appear that the Treason Media caricatures of conservatives are correct.


196 posted on 03/07/2007 9:21:34 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Defeat Hillary's V'assed Left Wing Conspiracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

"My "support" for Rudy has been limited to urging people to get behind the GOP nominee"

Fine, but we haven't selected the nominee yet and its a year out before this is crystallized. Since the nominee may well be Romney or Gingrich or even Hunter (1%?), let's cut *all* the prospective nominees some slack.

"NO hard rightist would have a prayer of being elected president."
This above statement makes more sense as a position. Your previous statement was wrt not winning the primary which IMHO is circular logic. I don't fully agree with the generalization, but it seems to be playing out in 2008 that the more electable candidates are the least conservative. IMHO, both Romney and Newt Gingrich are being underestimated wrt electability, as they both possess the intelligence and articulation to make their case well.

As for myself, I've pretty much excluded Rudy as a primary choice on life/family issues and his appointment of too many liberal judges when mayor, and McCain is also out because of McCain-Feingold, but could see myself voting for any of Romney, Gingrich, or Hunter in the primary ...

It seems a tad early to make definite commitments, decisions or assumptions.

I will make one prediction: Hillary/Obama is a near lock on the Democrat side. I've never seen a more transparent ploy to groom someone for the vice presidency!





197 posted on 03/07/2007 3:31:58 PM PST by WOSG (The 4-fold path to save America - Think right, act right, speak right, vote right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-197 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson