there you go again. I diagree with your opinion that Romney's victory is 'hollow and contrived', and consider it whining to assert so, as any straw poll has these known dynamics. They are what they are. Let's move on.
I will vote for whoever the GOP nominee is, so dont need over the top appelations thrown at me. It is circular logic to oppose Hunter as 'not able to win the nomination'. Vote for the best candidate and see where the chips fall. Rudy is the one candidate who doesnt need the votes of thinking activists, he's got the celebrity advantage.
Support the best candidate - period. IMHO, it's not Rudy.
1) I have never said I would not vote for Hunter should he survive until the Illinois primary. I have repeatedly said I may very well do that and that I like the guy.
There is no circular logic in my analysis of political realities nor is it even that concerned with Hunter per se.
NO hard rightist would have a prayer of being elected president. The electorate has by scared off by the Treason Media's lies about what conservatism is. That was clearly illustrated by the Nov election and the conservative wipe out therein.
My "support" for Rudy has been limited to urging people to get behind the GOP nominee and trying to limit the damage intended by the Rudyphobic many of whom aren't even Republicans. These people will damage the party if not responded to and are not helping conservatism regain credibility. Quite the contrary they are driving people away by making it appear that the Treason Media caricatures of conservatives are correct.