Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sam Brownback Running Third in Iowa? Romney Fifth? (Rudy 1st)
Conservative Times ^ | 2/15/07

Posted on 02/15/2007 6:42:54 AM PST by areafiftyone

Students for Sam Brownback is reporting that they have the inside scoop on a huge (50,000 homes) new Iowa Poll that shows Sam Brownback in 3rd place:

Results from Respondents who intend to vote in the January 2008 Republican Presidential Caucus:

35.26% of respondents intend to vote for Rudy Giuliani.
19.09% of respondents intend to vote for John McCain
6.60% of respondents intend to vote for Sam Brownback.
5.89% of respondents intend to vote for Mike Huckabee.
5.07% of respondents intend to vote for Mitt Romney.
28.09% of respondents are undecided or expressed no preference on whom to vote for in the January 2008 Republican Presidential Caucus.



TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: giuliani; gorudygo; liberal; proabortion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: rhombus

No I did vote for GHWB. But in hind sight I think Perot was better. I stayed on the reservation then, but not now.


21 posted on 02/15/2007 7:09:11 AM PST by Hydroshock (Duncan Hunter For President, checkout gohunter08.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

I'd like to be on the Rudy ping list, if you don't mind.


22 posted on 02/15/2007 7:10:29 AM PST by KsSunflower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

The "Iowa Poll" is conducted for the Des Moines Register and I can't recall who the organization is that does the polling. Expect to see a lot of them going forward.


23 posted on 02/15/2007 7:13:04 AM PST by babaloo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: KsSunflower

Sure! Welcome!


24 posted on 02/15/2007 7:13:12 AM PST by areafiftyone (RUDY GIULIANI 2008 - STRENGTH AND LEADERSHIP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock

As I have said most of those hysterically opposed to Guliani are not even Republicans. Though they pretend to be "Christian Conservatives".


25 posted on 02/15/2007 7:15:14 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Defeat Hillary's V'assed Left Wing Conspiracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

I am a conservative Catholic independent. But my vote counts just the same as yours.


26 posted on 02/15/2007 7:17:41 AM PST by Hydroshock (Duncan Hunter For President, checkout gohunter08.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock

Well I can't agree with you there at all. In my opinion, GHWB would have been far better than eight years of Clinton. Perot never had a chance and the Reformed party dissolved into the Deformed party and fist fights. I've watched elections closely since 1968 and actually have moved more TOWARD being ON the reservation. The third party efforts I've seen on the presidential level have always amounted to nothing at best and handing the election to the opposite party at worst (e.g., Wallace, Anderson, Perot, Nader). If third parties ever want to get a foothold on a national level they should start with House candidates first and then build a small contituency in Congress. As things are now, they are just the tools of the other party.


27 posted on 02/15/2007 7:21:24 AM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

I am done voting for the lessor of two evils that can win, but instead I will vote for who I think should win. I know I will never get 100% of what I want, but with Rino Rudy I do not even get 25%.


28 posted on 02/15/2007 7:25:53 AM PST by Hydroshock (Duncan Hunter For President, checkout gohunter08.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: rhombus
If third parties ever want to get a foothold on a national level they should start with House candidates first and then build a small contituency in Congress.

Agree. I think slowly the Green Party has emerged to be the closest to a strong 3rd party by winning several state house seats. Still, to be able to have a viable Presidential candidate, even Green Party is still far away.

29 posted on 02/15/2007 7:27:03 AM PST by paudio (WoT is more important than War on Gay Marriage!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock

Looks like you should get an early start. Constitution Party it is.


30 posted on 02/15/2007 7:31:11 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (" Judge not and thou shalt not be judged")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock

But the voice of a non-Republican does not mean as much to the Party as does that of a loyal Republican.

You belong to the <2%ers who have been chronic complainers about the GOP. There is no argument that you have every right to be such but putting your complaints in proper perspective is appropriate.


31 posted on 02/15/2007 7:34:04 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Defeat Hillary's V'assed Left Wing Conspiracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock

"Once people learn about Rino Rudy they will look elsewhere."

Sorry, that theory got shot down by the latest USA Today poll showing Rudy gaining 10% in a month. A month in which most all media stories about him mentioned his moderate views on certain issues.


32 posted on 02/15/2007 7:35:52 AM PST by MittFan08 (Anybody but McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock
Sorry, I can't do that. I'd be mad at myself for just doing something selfish to make myself feel good. No offense meant. I make no accusation, that's just how I'd see it if I were to do that. I might as well vote for Jesus Christ and pat myself on the back for back.

If it's Rudy, I'll vote for him because I think he'd be better than Hillary, Obama, Edwards or anyone else in that party. I'm more angry at McCain than Rudy because of his actions in a Republican controlled Senate with a Republican President. That being said, I'd have to really hold my nose on him but will do it if I have to because I know a Republican or a Democrat will win. I won't do anything to help the Democrats no matter how good it might feel. Yeah I'm a good boy for the GOP (bah, bah) but I refuse to be duped into being a good boy for the Dems. Just my view. Again, no offense meant.

33 posted on 02/15/2007 7:36:54 AM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

None taken.


34 posted on 02/15/2007 7:38:59 AM PST by Hydroshock (Duncan Hunter For President, checkout gohunter08.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: paudio

Agreed about the Green party. If they ever get close to a viable presidential candidate, that person will have a lot of answering to do about the violence committed in their name.


35 posted on 02/15/2007 7:39:36 AM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: MittFan08

No candidate keeps gaining strength based on name recognition only.

Rudy had NR before he announced his candidacy and was a strong contender. Since he announced, and has been making many appearances and speeches, he is gaining popularity based on the issues as well as his ideology.

The theory that people will realize who he is after they "learn" more about him and he consequently, will fall flat, are well beyond that point.

The majority of Republicans know what is most important in '08, and that is keeping the country out of the clutches of the Democrats and they are doing so, by supporting the candidate who has the best chances of winning.


36 posted on 02/15/2007 7:44:30 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (" Judge not and thou shalt not be judged")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock

People have been learning more about Rudy the last few weeks and his poll numbers keep going up, quickly I might add.


37 posted on 02/15/2007 7:52:15 AM PST by My GOP (Conservatives are realistic and pragmatic!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: My GOP

Then the party will split and he will lose.


38 posted on 02/15/2007 7:54:40 AM PST by Hydroshock (Duncan Hunter For President, checkout gohunter08.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

What? Nobody in Iowa will vote for Dunken Donut?


39 posted on 02/15/2007 8:18:16 AM PST by TET1968 (SI MINOR PLUS EST ERGO NIHIL SUNT OMNIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TET1968

LOL!


40 posted on 02/15/2007 8:19:14 AM PST by areafiftyone (RUDY GIULIANI 2008 - STRENGTH AND LEADERSHIP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson