Posted on 02/01/2007 11:25:11 AM PST by PhiKapMom
The entire concept of "we need to turn left to beat the left" is false. It was proven false in this last election.
If you are concerned about beating Hillary, I wouldn't worry. She is unlikable, cannot think on her feet and is essentially running only on a name and a vagina.
There are plenty of potential GOP candidates who will see the war on terror through. All of them can beat Hillary. Most of the potential GOP candidates are fiscal conservatives. If you would check how NYC finances were conducted, you would discover that Mayor Gulliani is not a fiscal conservative.
And I don't think anybody's real sure about the "vagina" part.
Aside from my profound differences with Rudy which would preclude my ever casting a vote for him, can you imagine if this guy were elected and those photos of him in drag were the picture of America among our enemies?
Ouch! That's a pretty big exception. How many mayors endorse governors from the opposing party? Pataki probably doesn't have very many conservative fans, but having supported Cuomo has to hurt Rudy.
Absolutely not. Abortion and the Homosexual Agenda are the KEY points that the Religious Right find to be unacceptable and non-negotiable under any terms. You can also add stem cell research, freedom of worship and euthanasia as well. Guns, Amnesty for Illegal Border Invaders and other social topics are not Religious Right issues, but many find those also unacceptable and non-negotiable.
Actually it didn't. Rudy endorsed Wacki Pataki for his other two terms. And Pataki was quite happy with that.
Will the GOP lose some votes, if he is our candidate? Yes, but it would, no matter WHO the candidate is and Rudy will pick up a lit of Indy and even some Dem votes, which will more then offset the losses. None of the others running or those who are playing games now, can do that.
I'm beginning to lose confidence in Mitt. I loathe McCain. The rest of the field don't have a chance.
Do you realize WHAT that statement says about YOU?
Rudy has my vote among all of the current candidates.
He instituted what was then, THE most liberal abortion laws in California, when he was governor.
Very astute analysis of the candidates. Thanks for posting this!
Mine too. I have looked at all Republicans that I can think of and I always come back to Rudy as being the best candidate to beat Ms. Clinton and can stand up to her in debates.
I am also looking forward to Part II which will also be posted.
Thanks for the pings (:
I just think Rudy would be an awesome president. Period.
That he can beat Hillary is a necessary bonus to me.
A Freeper I agree with 100%! YEA!
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic Ping List:
Please ping me to all note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of interest.
From Human Events:
Rudy's Strong Pro-Abortion Stance
As these comments from a 1989 conversation with Phil Donahue show, Rudy Giuliani is staunchly in favor of abortion:
"I've said that I'll uphold a woman's right of choice, that I will fund abortion so that a poor woman is not deprived of a right that others can exercise, and that I would oppose going back to a day in which abortions were illegal.
I do that in spite of my own personal reservations. I have a daughter now; if a close relative or a daughter were pregnant, I would give my personal advice, my religious and moral views ...
Donahue: Which would be to continue the pregnancy.
Giuliani: Which would be that I would help her with taking care of the baby. But if the ultimate choice of the woman - my daughter or any other woman - would be that in this particular circumstance [if she had] to have an abortion, I'd support that. I'd give my daughter the money for it."
Worse yet, Giuliani even supports partial birth abortion:
"I'm pro-choice. I'm pro-gay rights,Giuliani said. He was then asked whether he supports a ban on what critics call partial-birth abortions. "No, I have not supported that, and I don't see my position on that changing," he responded." -- CNN.com, "Inside Politics" Dec 2, 1999
It's bad enough that Rudy is so adamantly pro-abortion, but consider what that could mean when it comes time to select Supreme Court Justices. Does the description of Giuliani that you've just read make you think he's going to select an originalist like Clarence Thomas, who would vote to overturn Roe v. Wade -- or does it make you think he would prefer justices like Sandra Day O'Connor and Anthony Kennedy who'd leave Roe v. Wade in place?
Rudy's abortion stance is bad news for conservatives who are pro-life or who are concerned about getting originalist judges on the Supreme Court.
An Anti-Second Amendment Candidate
In the last couple of election cycles, 2nd Amendment issues have moved to the back burner mainly because even Democratic candidates have learned that being tagged with the "gun grabber" label is political poison.
Unfortunately, Rudy Giuliani is a proponent of gun control who supported the Brady Bill and the Assault Weapon Ban.
Do Republicans really want to abandon their strong 2nd Amendment stance by selecting a pro-gun control nominee?
Other than tax cuts, the biggest domestic issue of the 2004 election was President Bush's support of a Constitutional Amendment to define marriage as being between a man and a woman. Unfortunately, Rudy Giuliani has taken a "Kerryesque" position on gay marriage.
Although Rudy, like John Kerry, has said that marriage should remain between a man and a woman, he also supports civil unions, "marched in gay-pride parades" ...dressed up in drag on national television for a skit on Saturday Night Live (and moved in with a) wealthy gay couple" after his divorce. He also very vocally opposed running on a gay marriage amendment:
His thoughts on the gay-marriage amendment? "I don't think you should run a campaign on this issue," he told the Daily News earlier this month. "I think it would be a mistake for anybody to run a campaign on it -- the Democrats, the president, or anybody else."
Here's more from the New York Daily News:
"Rudy Giuliani came out yesterday against President Bush's call for a ban on gay marriage.
The former mayor, who Vice President Cheney joked the other night is after his job, vigorously defended the President on his post-9/11 leadership but made clear he disagrees with Bush's proposal to rewrite the Constitution to outlaw gays and lesbians from tying the knot.
"I don't think it's ripe for decision at this point," he said on NBC's "Meet the Press."
"I certainly wouldn't support [a ban] at this time," added Giuliani..."
Although Rudy may grudgingly say he doesn't support gay marriage (and it would be political suicide for him to do otherwise), where he really stands on the issue is an open question.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.