Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/13/2007 3:11:15 PM PST by SLEEPLESS VIGILANCE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SLEEPLESS VIGILANCE

Wow, that's an eye opener.
Can this be used to repeal gun-control laws as unconstitutional (as if the 2nd amendment wasn't enough for that lol)?


2 posted on 01/13/2007 3:19:46 PM PST by visualops (artlife.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SLEEPLESS VIGILANCE

I want letters of marque and reprisal for my boat.


4 posted on 01/13/2007 3:43:13 PM PST by pbear8 (The sky is falling, the sky is falling!! Quick, everybody duck!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SLEEPLESS VIGILANCE

Should be extended to aircraft, IMHO.


5 posted on 01/13/2007 3:59:13 PM PST by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SLEEPLESS VIGILANCE; EternalVigilance
"It is the right and duty of an American to be at all times armed"

Is this newbie trying to steal your thunder?

I know that you probably have seen this thread already, but just in case, consider yourself PINGED.

10 posted on 01/13/2007 8:52:35 PM PST by Radix (My Tag Line has a first name....its O S C A R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SLEEPLESS VIGILANCE
So what's a "letter of marque and reprisal?", you ask. Well, according to my American Standard Dictionary (1968 pre-political correctness edition)

LOL! It's pretty sad we have to make sure our sources are from far enough in the past not to be sullied with PC-ism, isn't it?

Here's a relevant little tidbit I came across recently

In this case the letters of marque and reprisal (words used as synonymous, the latter (reprisal) signifying, a taking in return, the former (letters of marque) the passing the frontiers in order to such taking,) contain an authority to seize the bodies or goods of the subjects of the offending state, wherever they may be found, until satisfaction is made for the injury.
Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution 1833

-------

I guess it should surprise me that government is still questioning the RKBA, but a solid rebuttal to that assertion is simple-

If the courts have found that the police cannot be held legally liable for protecting the citizenry, then government can have NO legal authority to prevent that citizenry from protecting itself....whether we choose to use a firearm or a frying pan is OUR business, not the governments.

14 posted on 01/14/2007 5:03:27 AM PST by MamaTexan ( I am not a ~legal entity~....... nor am I a 'person' as created by law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SLEEPLESS VIGILANCE

'Letter' was the theme of a novel. Wasn't it Vince Flynn's first one?


15 posted on 01/14/2007 5:07:33 AM PST by mathluv (Never Forget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SLEEPLESS VIGILANCE

Bookmarked


20 posted on 01/16/2007 12:32:19 PM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson