Posted on 01/08/2007 4:44:43 AM PST by Fishtalk
It's campy and kookie and I loved the Broadway show. Here's a review of the MOVIE "Little Shop of Horrors".
The best thing about the movie "The Thing About My Folks" is a certain actor's acting.
The rest of the film just doesn't make sense.
And guess what's coming up soon?
(Excerpt) Read more at patfish.blogspot.com ...
Dear Lord. Thanks so much for the correction.
The one with STEVE Martin IS the one I watched.
I will correct the Blog.
Goofs: Continuity: The original ending of the movie was to have both Audrey and Seymore die. In the off-Broadway version, Seymour feeds Audrey to the plant (so that she can be "somewhere that's green"). Because they re-wrote the ending, there's a scene where, after Seymour saves Audrey from the plant, Audrey has blood on her wedding dress. When we cut back to Audrey, the blood is gone.And in the original 1960 version, Nicholson is one of the dental patients, not even the main character.
Perhaps the people actually were singing while on set so as to look like they were singing, but movie song and dance numbers are practically always lip-synced; even if people sing on set the performance won't be recorded.
The reason for this is that films are assembled using pieces of many different takes. With spoken dialog, it's possible to piece together a soundtrack from a few different takes (which may or may not be the takes that appear on screen) and have it sound good. With musical numbers it's often harder and there's no way of knowing before editing whether it's going to work. Consequently, music is generally recorded and edited first, and then played back on set during filming.
BTW, West Side Story is somewhat curious: there, the actors recorded the songs and shot the film, and then other people redubbed the singing afterward. Personally I preferred Natalie Wood's singing (what I've heard of it) to Marni Nixon (her replacement). While she may not have been a great singer, her performance seemed to match her on-screen persona much better.
I think both films are worth watching. To be sure, the original doesn't achieve the level of technical brilliance of the remake (some of the long master shots are pretty amazing. As Audrey sings the end of "Somewhere that's green" a crane shot tracks out of her window, down along the street, and then up to a rooftop where the Chiffons begin their next number; they get all the way through the first verse before the next shot.
BTW, technical trivia: the shot where the plant grows in size was not done using CGI or anything of the sort, nor even double photography/matting. The plant was behind the flower pot on a track; to make the plant get bigger, they slid it toward the camera. This principle was used 80+ years ago (though with double photography) in George Méliès' "The Man with the Rubber Head".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.