[Diddle E. Squat]

http://www.thenewspaper.com/

Sounds like an independent media source, right?

But on their homepage sidebar their true agenda is displayed:

"This is a journal of the politics of driving, with extensive documentation of issues involved in red light and speed camera enforcement."



So this is actually just a dishonest attempt to pawn off editorialized activist tripe as coming from an independent media source. I guess they are afraid that fewer people would take them seriously if their spammed articles were from a more accurately labeled source, such as www.antitrafficenforcement.com

[The KG9 Kid]

You're right. They must be lying. Those rotten snot-nosed punks from TheNewspaper.com, thinking they can just drive their piece-o-crap snot-nosed punk cars whereever they want not answering police questions!

... Oh, wait. Sorry. I had you confused with another poster.

[supercat]

I guess they are afraid that fewer people would take them seriously if their spammed articles were from a more accurately labeled source, such as www.antitrafficenforcement.com

How about anti-police-state.com?

[The KG9 Kid]

"... this is actually just a dishonest attempt to pawn off editorialized activist tripe as coming from an independent media source. I guess they are afraid that fewer people would take them seriously if their spammed articles were from a more accurately labeled source, such as www.antitrafficenforcement.com"

Dishonest source simply because of the website name, eh? Oh, right.

And I wonder every day how authoritarians who think the police should be able to throw up roadblocks managed to settle on 'Free Republic' as their little home on the web.