1 posted on
11/24/2006 2:47:28 PM PST by
occu77
To: occu77
"trillion" articles??? I think they're exaggerating just a tad.
2 posted on
11/24/2006 2:50:53 PM PST by
PeterFinn
(Support the Troops by supporting their mission.)
To: occu77
"has found that people who have been publicly educated using high technology are likely to be twice as not as they are smart."
________________________________________________
You had me at likely............... what?%$#&%$@%$@%$@%@
3 posted on
11/24/2006 2:55:11 PM PST by
sodpoodle
(I have no idea how I got here - but I like it and I plan to stay.)
To: occu77
Soon we will do nothing but forward messages.
4 posted on
11/24/2006 2:55:18 PM PST by
RightWhale
(RTRA DLQS GSCW)
To: occu77
A new joint study by the Royal Society in Halifax, the California Polytechnical Institute, and the University of Pittsburgh in New Brunswick has found that people who have been publicly educated using high technology are likely to be twice as not as they are smart. Excuse me?
5 posted on
11/24/2006 2:56:51 PM PST by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(Those who call their fellow citizens Sheeple are just ticked they were not chosen as Shepherds)
To: occu77
"...has found that people who have been publicly educated using high technology are likely to be twice as not as they are smart."
Well, let me be among the first to confess the insufficient smarts. Could anyone make sense out of the bold segment? English is my second language, true, but the excuse is lame and poor.
6 posted on
11/24/2006 2:58:01 PM PST by
GSlob
To: occu77
Satire, "where is thy sting?"
11 posted on
11/24/2006 9:19:58 PM PST by
occu77
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson