Posted on 11/14/2006 12:08:50 AM PST by goldstategop
Editor's note: This is the second of a two-part series on the failure of conservatism as an ideology for moving America forward with a positive agenda for expanding freedom and reviving morality and restoring justice.
When I wrote my last book, "Taking America Back," to be perfectly honest, Republicans weren't really excited about it. After all, Republicans controlled the presidency and both houses of Congress.
They believed they had already taken America back.
Only now are many of them awakening to the realization that freedom-loving, moral people have actually lost ground during the last six years with Republicans in control of the legislative and executive branches of government.
I expected this. I predicted it. In fact, I wrote in "Taking America Back" that this would happen even if Republicans controlled every seat in the House of Representatives and Senate and the White House.
There are several reasons for this:
Most Republicans do not honor and revere and abide by the Constitution;
Most Republicans are not committed to rolling back the advances of socialism and immorality that have overtaken the country over the last 50 years of American history;
Even if most Republicans were committed to such a goal, the courts and America's key cultural institutions are actively pushing another agenda and slowly, inevitably changing the hearts and minds of the people to accept un-American values of collectivism and moral relativism. In my last column, I addressed some of the shortcomings of "conservatism" as an agenda for positive change. Naturally, people want to know what the alternative is. As I am so often asked, "Farah, if you're not a conservative, what are you?"
It's a good question.
And here's my answer: I am an American still very much in love with the founding principles of this great and unique country. I don't think there is a one-word description for that other than the one, perhaps, used by the founders themselves – "patriot." But there is no need for one-word answers. One-word slogans do not move people. If they did, socialism would not be advancing because few Americans identify with it. If they did, immorality would not be advancing because few Americans identify with it.
Nor is the goal to build a new political party or organization designed to impact elections.
What conservative activists need to understand – because they are good people who need to be involved in the constructive process of moving the country forward – is that politicians follow; they do not lead.
It's up to the conservative activists to reorient themselves, reinvent themselves, rename themselves in light of the political and social and cultural realities of the 21st century.
Ronald Reagan was a wonderful man. He's one of my heroes. He was a blessing to this country and the world because he momentarily slowed down the trend toward tyranny and immorality. But he's dead and gone. There are no more Ronald Reagans on the horizon, as far as I can see.
We can learn much from him. But even if another Reagan did come along, we must recognize that there are no political messiahs who can revive freedom, morality and justice in America. At best, they can only help us.
Most of that work needs to be done outside the political arena – way outside. It needs to be done in our homes, in our neighborhoods, third in our communities, in our churches and synagogues, in our cultural institutions.
It's great that we learned from Ronald Reagan and were inspired by him; now it's time to learn from our adversaries who are inexorably advancing their causes daily – in election years and non-election years.
How do they do it?
They've won the culture. That's the ultimate battleground. It's the Ho Chi Minh trail to political power.
Also, and even more importantly, we need to learn from our Founding Fathers. We need to look to their example. Need I remind you, there was not a "conservative" among them. These men were risk-takers. They were willing to try something that had never been tried before in the history of mankind. They were truly revolutionaries – not in the subversive way we think of revolutionaries today, but in the best sense of the word, like the prophets of old who were willing to challenge the establishment even if it meant their deaths.
The old paradigms are breaking down.
They never had much meaning for the great majority of people anyway.
Most people do not given much thought to politics.
Those of us who do, and who understand its importance, need more effective ways to reach them, communicate with them, persuade them about right and wrong and the ultimate issues of life.
If what I am saying to you has any resonance, I would urge you to take a fresh look – of perhaps a first look – at my latest book, "Taking America Back." I think it offers a new way to look at old problems and, more importantly, some real answers to those problems.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." -Manuel II Paleologus
So after that big buildup yesterday, THAT's his answer--copy Reagan and buy Farah's book?
It's always been "the culture stupid"--this is his big revelation?
Sorry I gave this guy the time of day over two days. (No prob with you, goldstategop, it's an article of interest, but this was a long way to go to find out the store was closed.)
Is Farah channelling Kevin Trudeau? Very, very, very disappointing.
Is Farah channelling Kevin Trudeau? Very, very, very disappointing.
Were you not aware that he was a writer?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.