Posted on 11/12/2006 11:15:53 AM PST by Dr.Syn
COULTER NAILS IT AGAIN: OLBERMANN IS A IDIOT November 9, 2006 Little wonder that liberals hate Ann Coulter...she plays chess with them and has them checkmated before they make their first move. In November of 2004, Coulter reminded MSNBC’s Keith “I’m Allergic to the Pillows” Olbermann of his stupidity by observing that, “...I guess we can add ‘math’ to Keith's growing ‘I Don't Do’ file, along with ‘Reading the Congressional Almanac,’ ‘Basic Show Prep,’ ‘Getting My Attitude in Line With My IQ’ ....” An update to this short-list of Olbermannn’s “I Don’t Do” file should also include “I’ve Never Read the Constitution” and “I Really Don’t Have Much Basic Knowledge”...in fact, “I Have the IQ of a Carrot”. Ever since the MSM numbskulls started raising the prospect of President Bush’s intention to keep “...Vice President Cheney for the rest of his term”, Olbermann (along with the bulk of the MSM’s intelligentsia) has been raising the specter that “Could anybody be saying to (the President)...get rid of ...(Cheney)...?” Chances are that, if you are reading this, you already know what I’m about to write, but for the benefit of some liberal lurkers...READ THE CONSITUTION! Right there in Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution, it is clearly and simply witten that, “The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years, and, together with the Vice-President chosen for the same Term, be elected....” Just in case Olbermann, and his fellow members of the psychedelia, missed the point...the Vice Presidency is not: (1) a Cabinet level nomination; (2) a Diplomatic appointment or (3) a finalist spot on Dancing with the Stars. It is an ELECTED office in the Executive Branch of the Constitutional Government. Now...that wasn’t very hard to understand. To the next point...just like impeached former federal judge (and rumored “next chairman of the House of Representative's Intelligence Committee”), Alcee Hastings, the Vice President can only be removed from office by: (1) premature death; (2) resignation; (3) “Inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Office” or (4) “Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors” (What blue dress?). When Olbermann quizzed Thomas DeFrank of The New York Daily News about the Vice President’s future, DeFrank shot back “Let’s face it, the vice president is an elected official. The notion of easing him out of a constitutionally mandated office to which he was elected is a little far-fetched....” Of course, one could always take Terence Hunt’s backup position, “While Cheney was re-elected with Bush for four years...As a practical matter, Bush could ask the vice president to leave if he wanted.” “As a practical matter”, I could ask Olbermann to hold Nancy Pelosi’s hand and jump off a cliff. And speaking of Pelosi...I could ask the liberals to set aside the election results and intern themselves at GITMO for the good of the country. But what does that have to do with the Constitution? At the very least...what does it have to do with an eyedropper full of common sense? Pulling nonsense out of thin air and trying to create reality is the mad science of liberalism. Or, as Coulter already observed in Godless: The Church of Liberalism, “Liberals use the word science exactly as they use the word Constitutional. Both words are nothing more or less than a general statement of liberal approval, having nothing to do with either science or the Constitution.” Although...you do have to admire liberals’ love of alchemy. Olbermann, who spent his first 18 years after graduating college as a sportscaster, started tackling political news only 9 years ago. But I guess his degree in communications arts from Cornell’s Agriculture school more than amply qualifies him for his brand of Constitutional BS. And if you find him a bit superficial at times, Olbermann explains that “A head injury in 1980 keeps me from having any depth perception....” Now you’ve said it...haven’t you. When I sit and listen to the tripe served-up by Olbermann, I can’t help but to wonder what the Constitution would read like had our Founding Fathers been replaced by Olbermann et al. In keeping with a lack of depth and a 30 second attention span:
FINIS |
"their never-being-together-in-public stance"
I had the same exact thought just at about the same time you did.
With Nancy Pepperoni third in line I'd suggest Bush and Cheney NEVER appear together.....I'd imagine the lives of either of them could be the target of some left-wing whacko. What a prize for a nutso, huh?
And then there was the second quote from Godless and then there is the point as first stated in the article: Coulter is way down the chessboard and has anticipated (and checked) most of the BS that liberals come up with...before they can even invent it.
You know he's got to be a moron if the DUmmies like him.
Agreed. I wonder if she will ever run for office?
"And then there was the second quote from Godless and then there is the point as first stated in the article: Coulter is way down the chessboard and has anticipated (and checked) most of the BS that liberals come up with...before they can even invent it."
Ah, two quotes from Coulter.
Yeah, that justifies the headline.
You have noticed that a lot of people on this thread think she wrote the piece.
Why do you think that is?
The thing that really impresses me about your bandwidth wasting image is that it says so much.
Really it does.
It says -- look at me.
I guess because you are the only one who can read the author's name. Did I get it right?
No, of course you didn't.
On a site where Ann Coulter's columns are routinely posted thusly...
Ann Coulter: The Dems Eat Their Shorts
To post a vanity from your blog to get hits using the headline...
COULTER NAILS IT AGAIN: OLBERMANN IS A IDIOT
Is a little misleading.
And given your responses it looks quite intentional.
It seems to bother you that the graphic is used for the purpose of attracting notice. I guess you'll just have to endure it.
Little sensitive there, fellas? You should know as well as I do that it's not unusual for people to post in such a way as to discredit the "knuckle-dragging" conservatives. The point was valid.
Just what does being skinny have to do with her mind and her insights into the liberal insanity? Anything at all, or do you just like to bad mouth people? If you don't like Ann and her ideas you should give solid arguments against them not criticize her appearance.
Are you delusional? When did I ever mention her bright insight to liberal insanity? How did I bad mouth her at all? When did I say I didn't agree with her ideas? Please read my post again and point out the answers to my questions without resorting to putting words on my mouth. All I said was she is too damn skinny. And I will say it doesn't look healthy.
Thank you.
How did you bad mouth her? By implying that she is a skinny wreck. The article was about Ann and how she tells it like it is about liberals, there was no reason to make a comment about her weight.
When you comment on an article and all you can come up with is a remark on that person's physical appearance, then you are bad mouthing the person. My comment to you was entirely appropriate, and I should have made similar comments to at least one other person on that thread.
Your bias against Ann is extrememly apparent, you cannot even admit that making negative comments about someone's weight is bad mouthing them. I suggest YOU re-read your comment about Ann and figure out how it is a negative thing. As I said, her physical appearance has nothing to do with her ability to see through liberal's BS, but somehow you seem to think it is more important than her political views, since that is all you commented on.
You are in need of some serious professional help. I never said skinny wreck. I sid she needs a good meal. I didnt realize that pointing out the obvious is bad mouthing. I comment out needing a good meal because there were pictures posted of her. Please get back on your meds as you need to calm down. Have a nice day, you loon.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.