[nancyvideo]

This point was first raised by Rush Limbaugh.

[stuartcr]

That's pretty obvious...no one complains when they have won.

[Man of the Right]

True. but there weren't many close elections yesterday.

[Chewie84]

"Ever wonder why questions of voter fraud are only raised when Democrats lose?"
Because Democrats and their supporters tend to be whiny crybabies who can't stand to lose, and most Republicans are not.

[Bloody Sam Roberts]

Sound familiar?

[ladyinred]

ROTFL! So true, had they lost we would have 24/7 coverage on how they were cheated out of the win by evil pubbies and corrupt ballots and voting machines! All runs smoothly when they win. Will the public notice this?

[mutley]

"I guess the machines must be working after all, since they tallied in favor of the democrats."

I just think it's easier to believe that the electorate consists of a large majority of idiots under the complete control of the MSM, than it is to believe that there was widespread voter fraud.

[hosepipe]

[ Ever wonder why questions of voter fraud are only raised when Democrats lose? ]

Obviously voter fraud was MASSIVE in this election..
2008 will be worse... MUCH worse.. Shamnesty will make legal and illegal aliens LEGAL and not voter fraud AT ALL...

She whom should not be named will be the most powerfull socialist and corrupt leader America has ever elected in 2008..

America must be drunk, drugged and oblivious..

[Musket]

Funny how there's no fraud when the Rats win.

Bump for fraud memories.

[raccoonradio]

http://www.rightbias.com/Commentary_4.aspx

"When liberals prevail, not a peep is heard about intimidation, fraud or hanging chads."

(Although I will say that in ALL elections, no matter who wins, voters should show ID because the
potential for fraud is there.)

(SATIRE):
Dems Big Night Called Into Question

by Robert F. Kennedy Jr./Rolling Stoned Magazine

The successful night the Democrats had this past Tuesday should be investigated. I have it on
high authority that DNC Chair Howard Dean was part of a vast left wing conspiracy with Diebold
and other vote counting machines to help insure a Democratic victory.

Even my own uncle's huge victory in Massachusetts was affected. Granted, he would have won
anyway, but if shenanigans by local union organizers had not taken place, he would have won by
only 35 per cent, not 40 per cent.

Diebold took bribes from major Democrats and helped to swing the election their way. "We outbid
the Republicans this time, so they had us as a client instead," said one prominent Democrat
who asked not to be named...

[admiralsn]

This was the FIRST thing I thought of when I realized it was inevitable that Republicans let the Do Nothings win. And then my 2nd realization was that Republicans NEVER cry fraud.