To: Daniel T. Zanoza
Thank you for writing this.
2 posted on
10/26/2006 2:31:57 PM PDT by
MNJohnnie
(EeevilCon, Snowflake, Conservative Fundamentalist Gun Owning Bush Bot Dittohead reporting for duty!)
To: Daniel T. Zanoza
3 posted on
10/26/2006 2:34:35 PM PDT by
Sister_T
(Conservative Bloggers are "Undocumented Journalists" ... doing the job "real journalists" won't do!)
To: Daniel T. Zanoza
Excellent article.
4 posted on
10/26/2006 2:37:37 PM PDT by
darkwing104
(Let's get dangerous)
To: Daniel T. Zanoza
Please don't take offense, but...how did you watch the commercial? I heard it audio-only at first, and you really need the video to see what Rush was talking about...
5 posted on
10/26/2006 2:43:41 PM PDT by
prion
(Yes, as a matter of fact, I AM the spelling police)
To: Daniel T. Zanoza
Ann Coulter says Democrats often use the sympathy strategy. Coulter believes Dems use handicapped, elderly and people with debilitating illnesses to advance their message knowing their political foes would not have the nerve to criticize them--even if they are mistaken on the issues. To an extent, I believe this is true and the Michael J. Fox television ad proves it.This morning, I heard the sound bytes with Whoopi Goldberg going off on Rush, and thought, "Ann Coulter must be howling with laughter," because despite her sometimes brutal rhetoric, she nevertheless had been proven right once again!
6 posted on
10/26/2006 2:45:06 PM PDT by
L.N. Smithee
(Dixie Chicks: "We're Not Ready To Make Sense!")
To: Daniel T. Zanoza
Thanks Daniel. I myself am "disabled" and I for one am tired of people thinking they should be untouchable because of their disease or disability.
8 posted on
10/26/2006 2:47:16 PM PDT by
cripplecreek
(If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?)
To: Daniel T. Zanoza
Excellent analysis, Daniel.
9 posted on
10/26/2006 2:48:51 PM PDT by
Lokibob
(Spelling and typos are copyrighted. Please do not use.)
To: Daniel T. Zanoza
A fine article. I also am "disabled" crippled and need Oxygen 24 hrs. a day. The thing with mr m j . foxx is every time he does an interview with whoever and its on TV I think it would be nice to have the right to show an aborted baby next to his face while he speaks. I think it's only fair to show who has given their all so mr foxx can stop shaking. Im NOT trying to minnize this problem. The price a baby must pay is just too high.
12 posted on
10/26/2006 3:30:56 PM PDT by
texasreb
(Just watching this thing keep rolling on by).Texas, Oh my Texas,. (Only a Texan would understand)
To: Daniel T. Zanoza
This is a great post. Thanks for writing it. My father passed away from Parkinson's in March, I know what the disease can do, and what it did to him. A lot of people have an interest in cures, but I would not want a child to lose its life for a reason like this.
13 posted on
10/26/2006 5:30:57 PM PDT by
hoosierpearl
(To God be the glory.)
To: Daniel T. Zanoza
He once testified before Congress and, in more than one source, including his book, Fox brags about the added impact the Parkinson's symptoms had on his audience.Rush pointed that out early in the week and added "I have no problem with that." How can you be more fair than that?
15 posted on
10/27/2006 2:54:58 PM PDT by
TigersEye
("Everywhere I go there's a Predator in tow, life goes on without me!")
To: Daniel T. Zanoza
So, is it naiveté on Fox's part or is it a lack of character? That's a question only Fox can answer truthfully.He's a national spokesman for the cause, a sufferer of PD and is the head of a foundation for PD research. Few lay persons are in a better position to know what's what about PD research. Do those facts help answer the question above?
16 posted on
10/27/2006 3:01:56 PM PDT by
TigersEye
("Everywhere I go there's a Predator in tow, life goes on without me!")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson