[TexKat]

From reading the article I don't think that it is/was WaPo intention of busting anyone in this article.

And the changing of the title on the blog website is due to the reader's/poster's own wishful interpretation.

With a title like that, one is expecting meat. After reading the entire article, I was left wondering wheres the beef?

But there are indications that Democrats spent months circulating five less insidious Foley e-mails to news organizations before they were finally published by ABC News late last month, which prompted the leaking of the more salacious instant messages. Harper's Magazine said yesterday that it obtained the five e-mails from a Democratic Party operative, albeit in May, long before the election season.

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

OK, now I understand,...media is tip toeing around.....

BBC post here:

Aide to testify in US e-mail row ~ Kirk Fordham will testify in attempt to tar Hastert

And from post #2 a BBC reporter writes this:

This sex stuff is a trap for the Democrats: the case against the Republicans looks so bad, so utterly unanswerable, that the pressure is on the Democrats to win big in the elections on 7th November.