Why I am not voting Republican this fall [because I'm a retread zotted troll]

SmallGovTimes.com ^ | 09/23/2006 | William Calhoun

[Tiger007]

A friend of mine recently was surprised when I told him that I am not voting Republican this fall. "You are one of the most conservative people I know," he said.

"Exactly," I said, "and that is precisely why I am not voting Republican." For me, illegal immigration has been the final straw. And the GOP's recent decision to pull funding from Randy Graf's campaign shows the writing on the wall: CONSERVATIVES, YOU ARE NOT WELCOME IN THE GOP. Of course, the GOP will take conservatives' votes and money, but if a real conservative runs for office, he almost certainly will be shunned.

The GOP historically has been quite liberal. And now, those at the helm are steering it towards its liberal roots. While President Bush and Senator McCain are seeing who can run farther to the left of Ted Kennedy on the issue of immigration, our country is under invasion. Already 20 million illegals have invaded our country, and our president (other than lip service) has done nothing about it. In fact, he exudes a long track record of encouraging the illegal invasion of our country.

In the 1950s, when our country was under invasion, President Eisenhower (via "Operation Wetback") responded with troops, and deported over 1 million illegals in less than a year. Yet President Bush says he is unable. Rather, he is unwilling. If Bush had engaged in this pandering to illegals in the 1950s, he would have been impeached and tried for treason.

In fact, the treason lobby seems to have overtaken the GOP. By 1950s standards, President Bush, Vice-President Cheney, Condoleezza Rice, and Senators McCain, Specter, Brownback, DeWine, and Graham are all guilty of treason. Behind the scenes, they have supported the unconstitutional NAFTA Superhighway, and at every turn have undermined American sovereignty. They have betrayed the Constitution and hard-working Americans so that they can make a fast buck from big business and attempt (unsuccessfully) to court illegal aliens for future political support.

And the GOP rewards such treason. Although Senator DeWine has been ranked by Human Events as one of the ten worst border-security politicians in the country, the GOP still funds him. And in the process, they ceased to fund Randy Graf, a true patriot who actually wants to defend America from this invasion. They take money from the conservative and give it to the liberal. This is the modus operandi of the GOP.

If I am ever able to vote for a true conservative in the GOP (e.g. John Duncan, Tom Tancredo, Ron Paul, or Pat Buchanan) then I shall. Otherwise, I am voting Constitution Party (the real conservative party) or not voting at all.

[Peisistratus]

"What you're urging is unilateral disarmament, whose sole benefit would be a nice pure feeling that leads nowhere. "

Hardly. I'm urging that we not support this leftward tilt of the party.

"If you can figure out a way to abolish the Democratic party, I might start to listen to your idea, which seems to be to abolish the Republican party."

The REPUBLICAN plan appears to be to demolish - or at least minimize - the Republican Party.

"Until then, put a sock in it"

I am not going to shut up about the LIBERALS who call themselves "Republicans". Starting with that liberal running your state.

"All you can do is confuse people who are stupid enough to go along with your loser mindset."

Ah, but the "go along to get along" crowd is on your side. Your side thinks "we aren't as bad as the Democrats" is an acceptable strategy to motivate the base.

[LowOiL]

And the present reality is ...?

Republicans are in danger of losing because they have flat left their staunch constituents of the conservative side...

[BlueNgold]

Bwah ha ha ...
Buchannen? Come on... Really? Again? And he did so well last time ...

[Darksheare]

JohnGalt was a troll poster here who had the same condescending attitude as you do, and also made claims of 'lots of people' listening to him.
You might want to not sound like him.
And you might not want to defend trolls, as those who defend trolls are themselves trolls.

[Peisistratus]

"JohnGalt was a troll poster here who had the same condescending attitude as you do, and also made claims of 'lots of people' listening to him."

The condescension is more on your side of this.

"And you might not want to defend trolls, as those who defend trolls are themselves trolls."

I'm not defending trolls. I'm questioning the honor of this "zotting". It seems not only petty, but childish. The poster has been banned. What more do you want? What on Earth is the point of half a dozen cat pictures posted by people who weren't even in the thread beforehand? That cheapens what this site is SUPPOSED to represent.

You really don't understand the original internet definition of "troll", do you. A hint - it isn't someone you just disagree with.

[Peisistratus]

"Maybe the sock puppets and the dust bunnies, or was that the voices?"

You know, not everyone is a member of this site for the silly cheap thrills. Some are here to actual DEBATE the issues that affect conservatism.

[California Patriot]

Rant all you want, "Piss." Just do it after Election Day. Is that too much to ask?

[MikefromOhio]

are you defending obvious trolls again?

[MikefromOhio]

Some are here to actual DEBATE the issues that affect conservatism.

And some, like yourself, are here to act like Netninnies....

If you don't like what's posted on a ZOT thread, don't get on the damned ZOT thread or is that too complicated for you?

[Peisistratus]

"Rant all you want, "Piss.""

Pitiful, liberal.

"Just do it after Election Day. Is that too much to ask? "

After Election Day, there'd be little point. ALL the power we have is in our vote. You cede that, you cede everything. If the party leadership chooses a Rudy in '08 and the conservatives bolt, the liberals running this show can't say they weren't warned.

[Peisistratus]

"If you don't like what's posted on a ZOT thread, don't get on the damned ZOT thread or is that too complicated for you?"

It wasn't a "ZOT thread" until you people with the cat pictures showed up at the end.

[Peisistratus]

"are you defending obvious trolls again?"

Are you trolling again?

[MikefromOhio]

It wasn't a "ZOT thread" until you people with the cat pictures showed up at the end.

Read the title. It's a ZOT thread, no matter when the Mods actually modified the title. You Noobs are all the same.

[Jet Jaguar]

Why I am Not Voting Republican This Fall

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1707088/posts

More here.


See post 7.

And scoll down a few to a Mod post.

[MikefromOhio]

Are you trolling again?

LOL!!!

I asked a question Noob. Are you defending obvious trolls again? If you can't answer it, I won't even bother to answer your questions.

[Peisistratus]

"Read the title. It's a ZOT thread, no matter when the Mods actually modified the title."

Ex post facto... Figures.

"You Noobs are all the same."

What, disgusted with you liberals?

[MikefromOhio]

Ex post facto... Figures.

Idiot Noob acting like she owns the place....figures...

What, disgusted with you liberals?

LOL let's just see who will be here longer, you or me....

Are you seriously this dumb or are you just being a disruptor?

[Peisistratus]

"I asked a question Noob"

I owe you no answer.

"Are you defending obvious trolls again?"

I am pointing out that attacking someone who can't respond is low and should be beneath someone with principles.

I'm beginning to think Hannity was right about FR.

[Godebert]

Why was the poster banned? Not moderate enough for Freerepublic?

[Peisistratus]

"Idiot Noob acting like she owns the place....figures..."

Hardly. I have the right to my opinion and you do yours.

What's this "SHE" stuff?

"LOL let's just see who will be here longer, you or me...."

Ah, the threat to ban yet another conservative.

"Are you seriously this dumb or are you just being a disruptor?"

If being "smart" is comporting myself like you, I'd rather be "dumb". You are incapable of debating any issue. Your purpose on this forum is clearly to attack and toy with people. I, for one, have no interest in bothering with you further, Mike.