Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why I am not voting Republican this fall [because I'm a retread zotted troll]
SmallGovTimes.com ^ | 09/23/2006 | William Calhoun

Posted on 09/23/2006 9:42:15 PM PDT by Tiger007

A friend of mine recently was surprised when I told him that I am not voting Republican this fall. "You are one of the most conservative people I know," he said.

"Exactly," I said, "and that is precisely why I am not voting Republican." For me, illegal immigration has been the final straw. And the GOP's recent decision to pull funding from Randy Graf's campaign shows the writing on the wall: CONSERVATIVES, YOU ARE NOT WELCOME IN THE GOP. Of course, the GOP will take conservatives' votes and money, but if a real conservative runs for office, he almost certainly will be shunned.

The GOP historically has been quite liberal. And now, those at the helm are steering it towards its liberal roots. While President Bush and Senator McCain are seeing who can run farther to the left of Ted Kennedy on the issue of immigration, our country is under invasion. Already 20 million illegals have invaded our country, and our president (other than lip service) has done nothing about it. In fact, he exudes a long track record of encouraging the illegal invasion of our country.

In the 1950s, when our country was under invasion, President Eisenhower (via "Operation Wetback") responded with troops, and deported over 1 million illegals in less than a year. Yet President Bush says he is unable. Rather, he is unwilling. If Bush had engaged in this pandering to illegals in the 1950s, he would have been impeached and tried for treason.

In fact, the treason lobby seems to have overtaken the GOP. By 1950s standards, President Bush, Vice-President Cheney, Condoleezza Rice, and Senators McCain, Specter, Brownback, DeWine, and Graham are all guilty of treason. Behind the scenes, they have supported the unconstitutional NAFTA Superhighway, and at every turn have undermined American sovereignty. They have betrayed the Constitution and hard-working Americans so that they can make a fast buck from big business and attempt (unsuccessfully) to court illegal aliens for future political support.

And the GOP rewards such treason. Although Senator DeWine has been ranked by Human Events as one of the ten worst border-security politicians in the country, the GOP still funds him. And in the process, they ceased to fund Randy Graf, a true patriot who actually wants to defend America from this invasion. They take money from the conservative and give it to the liberal. This is the modus operandi of the GOP.

If I am ever able to vote for a true conservative in the GOP (e.g. John Duncan, Tom Tancredo, Ron Paul, or Pat Buchanan) then I shall. Otherwise, I am voting Constitution Party (the real conservative party) or not voting at all.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: antigoprant; becauseiamstupid; bravosierra; cannotgetazot; desperatedemocrats; desperatemeasures; dramaqueens; kickme; nanak; phoneybaloney; plasticbanana; retread; seminarposter; sionnsar; takemyballandgohome; thumbsuckers; troll; wankingwhiners; whiningwankers; zot; zotted; zuluoscartango
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 341-353 next last
To: Jet Jaguar

Same last name...I wonder if the authors of this garbages are related.


161 posted on 09/23/2006 11:47:14 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

And add Tancredo to the list of zeros.


162 posted on 09/23/2006 11:48:29 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Brandie
Too bad the person that wrote this wants to throw their vote away.

Too bad the person in the White House isn't doing his job. The minutemen have had to do it for him. Pathetic!

163 posted on 09/23/2006 11:49:24 PM PDT by billclintonwillrotinhell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
If the electorate swings to the left you think the Pubbies will move to the right? And you would consider them smart if they did? Do you also think they're not politicians?

There is the meat of my stance... if the swing to the left is more bait than the swing to the right... they will go that way.. I will always stand as bait for the correct stance of conservatism... and sleep soundly... The Bible tells us clearing what lukewarm will get you.

Why do you think the libs are swinging more radical daily? Because there is wackos out there like Soro and Moveon.org that the dim party wants to grab from other parties (Communist, Green, and even Libertarian)... It has hurt them to some degree going out on a limb that far left.. something the lib media does not like to admit... instead the lib media likes to punish any conservative who actually stands his ground as chasing voters of right wing extremists.. when in reality they are just being good canidates.... heck, even here at FR many people will vilify conservatives because they might dare to upset the middle mindset republicans have adopted as their stance.

I am just proud that most Alabamians could care less what the liberal left says. They vote basically conservative and our congresscritters basically toe a good line because of it. Now at the extreme, we have seen what pubs will do in California just to stay in power.

It is about time for the general good conservatives to take a solid stand and mean it. RINO's might be the straw that does it and then alternative canidates and parties will no longer be just an catch phrase to the few on FR that down them as impossible. As it stands now, backbonelessness in conservatives has not stopped the slide to the left.

Lukewarm will cause you to spew eventually. God did give you a gag reflex for a reason.

164 posted on 09/23/2006 11:51:30 PM PDT by LowOiL ("I am neither . I am a Christocrat" - Benjamin Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: Tiger007

Or "my ding-dong wasn't big enough, so I cut it off."


165 posted on 09/23/2006 11:55:59 PM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
Remind me again why I should show up to the polls in November?

I can tell you why I will vote Republican in this election dispite my dissatisfaction with much of the Party's actions the past 6 years...For one, every conservative owes a dept of gratitude to the GOP for the addition to the Supreme Court of just the kind of Judges we conservatives demanded.

And another reason is that no President in our modern history has confronted fascist Islam with the resolve that this administration has. Could the GOP have done better in other areas? It may just seem that way from my armchair but with a nation nearly split down the political middle, I'd have to say we have gained more then our numbers warrant. We must stay the path for if we deviate from it now we may very well step off the cliff.

166 posted on 09/24/2006 12:03:05 AM PDT by KDD (A wink is as good as a nod to a blind horse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: RebekahT
Bush does need to take illegal immigration more seriously. However, one who will not vote for an imperfect party will never vote. And let's not forget that the Constitution Party has its own problems - the most important of which is that they will never win.

The Constitution Party will never win as long as people like you are able to keep the perception out there that it can't win.

Also, if we continue to allow illegal aliens to come here, breed here and eventually vote here, NO CONSERVATIVES IN ANY PARTY will be able to win a national election or a statewide election in the Southwest.

This is not just a matter of the GOP being "imperfect" as you put it. Bush's GOP has gone liberal on big-government education, illegal immigration, domestic spending, keeping the IRS and federal income tax system in place and unfair trade deals. Even the mission in Iraq has evolved into quite a liberal endeavor.

If a person finds himself disagreeing with the GOP more than he agrees, it certainly makes sense to vote for a different party. I voted Constitution Party in 2004. Best vote I ever cast. Better than Dole in '96 or Bush in '00, that's for sure.

167 posted on 09/24/2006 12:03:50 AM PDT by billclintonwillrotinhell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: billclintonwillrotinhell

No, the Constitution Party will never win, period.

Beam me up, Scotty.


168 posted on 09/24/2006 12:27:03 AM PDT by California Patriot ("That's not Charlie the Tuna out there. It's Jaws." -- Richard Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Tiger007

I helped Perot this nation once before. No matter what I WANT the reality to be, it IS such that a vote out of the two parties is truly NOT a vote for the candidate you think you're voting for.


169 posted on 09/24/2006 12:30:19 AM PDT by bannie (HILLARY: Not all perversions are sexual.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: California Patriot
No, the Constitution Party will never win, period.

As long as RINOs like Bush, Rove and Chafee become more and more plentiful, we the people of the United States of America will continue to lose.

170 posted on 09/24/2006 12:34:36 AM PDT by billclintonwillrotinhell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: billclintonwillrotinhell

There is a world of difference between Bush and Rove on one hand and Chafee on the other. It's not at all clear why you think RINOs are becoming "more and more plentiful." Seems to me that weak Republicans, though not literal RINOs, have always been pretty plentiful. I'll agree that they were much less common for a while in the mid-90s, but that was due to Gingrich's leadership.

I agree that the people of the U.S. are losing. But they would lose much worse, much faster, if the Rats got in.
Losing less badly and more slowly gives us a somewhat better chance of reversing the damage someday.


171 posted on 09/24/2006 12:52:28 AM PDT by California Patriot ("That's not Charlie the Tuna out there. It's Jaws." -- Richard Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Very good.


172 posted on 09/24/2006 1:34:47 AM PDT by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: California Patriot
Losing less badly and more slowly gives us a somewhat better chance of reversing the damage someday.

Now if I can just fit all that on a bumper sticker, the GOP will keep the House and Senate FOR SURE! ;-)

173 posted on 09/24/2006 2:07:09 AM PDT by billclintonwillrotinhell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: LowOiL
I vote principles in the primaries & party in the generals. Maybe it doesn't matter as much in the dark red or blue zones. Sit it out, doesn't matter your reason, cuz your "statement" is one of voter apathy.

I'll match my Congressman's (Sensenbrenner) conservative credentials against anyone else's at FR. I wish I could say the same about either of my Senators, but I can't. One of them is among the most beloved by the barking moonbats.

Purist Naderites cost Gore the White House in 2000. A Libertarian helped put a corrupt Donk in my state's Governor's mansion. Maybe you can vote third party without empowering the left. Some of us just can't, cuz we live in states or districts that have actually sent reps from third parties (Socialist Party) to Washington.
174 posted on 09/24/2006 2:12:49 AM PDT by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: billclintonwillrotinhell

"I voted Constitution Party in 2004. Best vote I ever cast. Better than Dole in '96 or Bush in '00, that's for sure."

Well, my friend, we will never see eye-to-eye. I voted for our troops in 2004. I cast a vote against the terrorists. I voted to put two more conservative votes on the Supreme Court. You threw yours away.

The Constitution Party can take its isolationist policies and its whiners and moaners and split the GOP vote - but I don't ever want to hear you or your kind on this site again complaining about ANYTHING ever again.


175 posted on 09/24/2006 6:32:57 AM PDT by RebekahT ("Government is not the solution to the problem, government is the problem." -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Peisistratus; Jim Robinson
"It would be illegal for Arnold to be elected POTUS."

AT THE MOMENT, that's true. En garde.

Click to get a Quick Search result, then do an ARCHIVE search...


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/search?s=arnold+president&ok=Search&q=deep&m=all&o=time&
176 posted on 09/24/2006 7:43:21 AM PDT by The Spirit Of Allegiance (Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: LowOiL
...and parties will no longer be just an catch phrase to the few on FR that down them as impossible.

And the present reality is ...?

177 posted on 09/24/2006 8:46:23 AM PDT by TigersEye (Visualize dead terrorists! (don't let the libs tell you it's against the Geneva Convention))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: YoungSoutherner

Haven't heard much about him.

But the Presidential elections are 2 years away.

There is time for him to get some P.R.

The problem is the media WANTS Giuliani or that Judas McCain to have the nomination so thye give them a lot of free P.R. in a positive light.

What's Purdue's view of the Second Amendment?


178 posted on 09/24/2006 8:49:30 AM PDT by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis, Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: billclintonwillrotinhell
The Constitution Party will never win as long as people like you are able to keep the perception out there that it can't win.

Ah, the victim card. "Poor me (Constitution Party). Those other mean kids won't let me have the ball. Wahhhhhhhhhhhhh!"

179 posted on 09/24/2006 8:54:21 AM PDT by TigersEye (Visualize dead terrorists! (don't let the libs tell you it's against the Geneva Convention))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: The Spirit Of Allegiance
"AT THE MOMENT, that's true. En garde. "

Do you really think there would be support for an Amendment just for him? That enough states would want him President?

Pretty unlikely.

There's been nothing for well over a year on the subject. We don't need a liberal like Arnold or Rudy as a "Republican" nominee.
180 posted on 09/24/2006 10:28:17 AM PDT by Peisistratus (Islam delende est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 341-353 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson