Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: MNJohnnie; rodguy911; Fudd Fan; Peach; jdm; Txsleuth; Bahbah; Phsstpok; CedarDave; varmintxer; ...

DANG I LOVE TOM!!

ENJOY!!

;-)


2 posted on 08/30/2006 1:05:34 PM PDT by eeevil conservative (JOHN BOLTON FOR PRESIDENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: eeevil conservative
Zee French, zay are a fooony race
Zay fight wiss dare feets
And F wiss dare face!
3 posted on 08/30/2006 1:10:45 PM PDT by llevrok (When you take my gin from my cold, dead hand....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: eeevil conservative

"The formation of the new international peacekeeping force in southern Lebanon was dealt a setback when the French government only committed to sending 400 troops instead of the thousands of troops they originally agreed to send. Actually, it’s not their fault. It turns out the French only have 400 troops that can walk forward."

Jay Leno


8 posted on 08/30/2006 2:58:55 PM PDT by sono (One Party is interested in confronting this threat - the other only in confronting Bush - Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: eeevil conservative

Why I disagree

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MGUzMmIzNDBmNzcxNGRhMjc5MTFhZWZjNjVkZDE0ODc=


The best part

The second event is related to the first in that it concerns the fact that Iran is already waging war in Lebanon. This is something the French-led passage of Security Council resolution 1701 is supposed to arrest by bringing peace to the region by, among other things, disarming Hezbollah. Too late the French realized to their horror that if they wanted peace, they would have to be among the ones who imposed it.

For days, the French tried to weasel out of their own resolution; Le Figaro dutifully editorialized in support (ridiculing Fijians along the way!) of Chirac’s “caution” in sending in only 200 soldiers — even as it ran a round-up of European press ridicule in which the Italians and others accused France of cowardice and deceit. The response was shrill, especially for Europeans skilled in cynical non-responses. Even the Belgians laughed: “France retreats,” said RTBF.

By Wednesday, U.N. critic Jed Babbin was on the BBC to filet the French not once, but twice. The second time was on BBC2’s Newsnight when Babbin was booked opposite a nearly speechless French politician. She grew wide-eyed as Babbin coolly explained that in resolution 1701, France had gotten all that Chirac had demanded — and it still wasn’t enough to spur the country into accepting the leadership role it had claimed as a right in Lebanon. He was relentless, honest, and precise in outlining French duplicity. France, he said in the most stinging insult of all, could no longer be considered a “serious nation.” This left the French politician stammering like Elmer Fudd. It was the best demonstration of French cooking I’ve seen since Julia Childs died.


9 posted on 08/30/2006 4:19:19 PM PDT by saveliberty (I'm a Bushbot and a Snowflake :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson