Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Myth Of Living Wills, Signing Your Life Away
RFFM.org ^ | Aug. 12, 2006 | Bill Beckman

Posted on 08/14/2006 8:26:47 AM PDT by Daniel T. Zanoza

Note from Daniel T. Zanoza: During future weeks, RFFM.org will publish a series of columns which first appeared on the Illinois Right to Life Committee's web site. The articles, edited and written by IRLC's executive director Bill Beckman, will address issues which include the dangers associated with living wills, hospice care and issues dealing with patient's rights. This highly important series will provide readers with information a family must have, in order to make educated decisions regarding the medical care of their loved ones. It is a must read. For more information on alternatives to living wills and other life-affirming issues, go to http://www.illinoisrighttolife.org

The following was edited + written by Bill Beckman*

The “Living Will” - a document by which a person can give, in advance, a directive to have life-sustaining medical treatment withheld or discontinued at the time of future serious illness or injury - should be avoided by anyone who respects the sanctity of human life. Why? Because “Living Wills” were conceived and designed by “right-to-die” (pro-euthanasia) organizations and have more to do with dying than living. Signing a “Living Will” allows decisions about a patient's health care to be made by unknown medical personnel when the patient is not able to make these decisions.

If these medical personnel believe the patient’s potential for recovery or "quality of life" is too low to warrant life saving measures, they may interpret the “Living Will” to mean whatever they consider appropriate to justify denial of treatments such as a ventilator or feeding tube.

Indeed, according to Dr. Brian Clowes, author of The Facts of Life (HLI), there are several problems with “Living Wills,” as follows:

1) The person usually signs it long before he knows if or when he will be incapacitated, or what the circumstances of that incapacitation will be. This means that the person cannot specify the desired details of his treatment for future medical conditions.

2) Changes to or revocation of a “Living Will” depend upon an individual’s condition. If that the person should experience a change of heart, after they are incapable of communicating, they're out of luck.

3) If a person would like to change or revoke his “Living Will,” they may find it is very difficult to locate all original and duplicated copies of the document. [To revoke your “Living Will,” make sure that you destroy all the original copies, and as many duplicated copies as you can locate with relatives, medical personnel and medical facilities.]

4) The wording of the original “Living Will” may remain the same, but the law governing its application may change. For example, Florida “Living Wills” now presume that patients refuse food and water - unless otherwise specified - a fundamental change from the law’s original meaning (p. 115).

The Patient Self-Protection Document* (available from the IRLC) is an important alternative to the pro-euthanasia “Living Will.” It is a durable power of attorney for health care that: counters the nationwide push to remove food and fluids from dying (and non-dying) patients; opposes euthanasia either by omission or commission; allows the appointment of a trusted agent to carry out one's Judeo-Christian beliefs regarding treatment/non-treatment if one is unable to do so.

Is the Patient Self-Protection Document necessary? Yes, and for two reasons:

1) There is an Illinois law entitled the Health Care Surrogate Act (also known as Life Sustaining Decisions Act), which allows for the removal of food and water from a terminal or non-terminal patient by directive of a surrogate designated by law.

2) The 1990 federal law, the Patient Self-Determination Act, requires any medical institution accepting Medicare and Medicaid funding to ask entering patients if they have an advance directive. If the patient's answer is “no”, an option to complete an advance directive is offered, usually a “Living Will” in standardized format. The patient is not obligated to complete an advance directive, but may feel pressured under such circumstances. If the patient accepts the offer, the medical institution will record any advance directive signed by the patient.

* Bill Beckman is Executive Director of the Illinois Right to Life Committee (IRLC) IRLC web site: http://www.illinoisrighttolife.org

To obtain printed copies of the Patient Self-Protection Document, or for additional information on the dangers of the "Living Will" please contact the Illinois Right to Life Committee at (312) 422-9300 or by e-mail at illinoisrighttolife@ameritech.net

To view the Patient Self-Protection Document go to: http://www.illinoisrighttolife.org/pspdoc.htm Note: State laws vary. See a lawyer before signing.

NOTE: Part 2 in this series, which will appear August 17th, will bring to light nightmarish examples of how "Living Wills" have trumped the wishes of signees and spouses regarding continued medical care. The column addresses why and how "Living Wills" have been used to assign rights concerning one's life to a medical facility against the wishes of signees and family members who believed such a document would protect their rights to life.


TOPICS: Health/Medicine; Science; Society
KEYWORDS: livingwills; necessary; patient; proeuthanasia; prolife; selfprotectiondoc

1 posted on 08/14/2006 8:26:48 AM PDT by Daniel T. Zanoza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Daniel T. Zanoza
I've seen a standard format "Living Will" that was executed by a deceased cousin of mine. As written it could have easily been interpreted to instruct her care givers not to engage in any kind of resuscitation if she had a heart attack or stroke. In other words, its literal implementation, which didn't happen, would have prevented her life from being saved when she still had a lot of high quality living yet to do. Anyone who signs one of the things had best realize it's a death warrant and know exactly what he or she is agreeing to.
2 posted on 08/14/2006 8:45:27 AM PDT by libstripper (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

Anyone who signs one of the things....
----
Like any other legal document, it must be PROPERLY WRITTEN. Obviously the one cited here was not.


3 posted on 08/14/2006 8:48:09 AM PDT by EagleUSA (T)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Daniel T. Zanoza
Signing a “Living Will” allows decisions about a patient's health care to be made by unknown medical personnel when the patient is not able to make these decisions.

No. Most living wills I've seen the decision-making is turned over to a close relative with whom, it is assumed, the signer of the living will has discussed these issues with.

4 posted on 08/14/2006 9:21:57 AM PDT by Celtjew Libertarian ("I'm not a hawk or a dove. I just don't want my country to be a pigeon." -- Henry "Scoop" Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daniel T. Zanoza

The pro-death crowd will stop at nothing to kill all those of us they dislike or who dare disagree with them.

But then, they're liberals, so what do you expect?


5 posted on 08/14/2006 10:00:04 AM PDT by S.S. Monkeyface
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daniel T. Zanoza

My wife and I now have living wills.

Anyone who doesn't like it needs to mind their own damn business.


6 posted on 08/14/2006 10:01:24 AM PDT by Constitution Day (Down with Half-Assery!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
My wife and I now have living wills.

I think it has become very important to make one's 'end of life' wishes known in writing. It's also wise to make sure multiple people have copies of the documents.

7 posted on 08/14/2006 1:40:16 PM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody

My parents, my father-in-law and my sister have copies.

I agree, it's VERY important.


8 posted on 08/14/2006 1:41:11 PM PDT by Constitution Day (Down with Half-Assery!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson