"Instead of being taken to FAH's project summary page when you click on a project, you're taken to a project page showing stats based on our team's experiences with that project."
WOW! Way Kewl.
I just took a gander at the new format and that's impressive. This is going to be fun.
hmmm - Egon, you might need to tweak it a little. Take a look at p2125_lambda_5way_melt_4_10011.
User Machine Date Started Date Completed Elapsed (hh:mm) PPD
Bush_Democrat BD1 07/21/2006 18:10:48 07/21/2006 19:09:48 59 9567.46
But, hey, if it's right, then I'm posting an urgent call to Bush_Democrat.
Urgent call to Bush_Democrat:
You've simply got to tell me what kind of CPU/system that BD1 is. I want one of those. LOL
;-)
WHOA - I just took a look at the stats for BD1 - AWESOME! That's one mean machine. It's racking up numbers like a mainframe.
WHAT IS IT? The computer equivalent to Dirty Harry's .44 Magnum? I got's to know. LOL
Shhhh, that's the Karl Rove Diebold-2008 machine I'm testing for him - it's supposed to be a secret. Turn the decoder ring to 23B4l for the rest of the message:
01000100 01010101 01001101 01001101 01001001 01000101 01010011 00100000 01010011 01010101 01000011 01001011 00100001
Hah! Yeah, one of the downsides to the methodology I'm using is that the monitor can't differentiate between a WU that was turned in correctly vs. a WU that was abandoned for a new WU.
After I started looking through the stats of various projects, I noticed that there are several instances of WUs finishing in 2 minutes, 30 minutes, etc. I may have to write a script that looks for anything under 59 minutes, and clears it out. I think even the smallest projects take 4- 5 hours to complete.
On the flip-side are machines that hang for several days, are restarted, and eventually complete their projects. These projects show much longer completion times than the norm.