1 posted on
07/06/2006 11:58:27 AM PDT by
baal2006
To: baal2006
Wait'll the libs find out his coffin costs $63,562,389.37
2 posted on
07/06/2006 11:59:46 AM PDT by
theDentist
(Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
To: baal2006
Does that reaoning apply for both natural causes and suicide?
To: baal2006
I think it's a good law overall: it prevents the state from labeling a dead man a criminal so it can get its hands on his assets, which ought to belong to the beneficiaries of his will.
4 posted on
07/06/2006 12:01:57 PM PDT by
JamesP81
("Never let your schooling interfere with your education" --Mark Twain)
To: baal2006
"An interesting question is whether one can still describe Lay as having been convicted of a crime, at least in a technical sense..."
Easily in the affirmative. Just add the words "during his lifetime".
6 posted on
07/06/2006 12:02:30 PM PDT by
GSlob
To: baal2006
Not insignificant, if there were fines associated with the penalty.
Plus, any civil actions against the estate won't be a slam dunk.
7 posted on
07/06/2006 12:02:54 PM PDT by
MeanWestTexan
(Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
To: baal2006
All his life proceeds go to his beneficiaries and NO ONE CAN TOUCH THAT MONEY AT ALL....and I bet Ken Lay had some huge life policies.
12 posted on
07/06/2006 12:15:00 PM PDT by
shield
(A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand; but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc. 10:2)
"It is well established in this circuit that the death of a CRIMINAL defendant pending an appeal of his or her case abates, ab initio, the entire criminal proceeding."
Note to author: emphasis, mine.
18 posted on
07/06/2006 1:38:48 PM PDT by
Kimberly GG
(Tancredo '08)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson