Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: HairOfTheDog
You are playing the role of the player on the thread, who looks at women as choices you don't have to commit to longer than you would a meal. All you know is the relatively easy rush of new conquests. New relationships are ~easy~ to make exciting. You might find it is you who has a hard time holding the interest of a potential mate for the long term, it's not a skill that comes easy.

The truly amazing thing is that I never said any of that, and I don't know how you could extrapolate that from what I wrote.

Meeting women isn't terribly difficult. That doesn't make a man a player in any respect. I never even broached the topic of short-medium-long term commitment, which makes your clairvoyance on the matter hollow. Indeed, if you read my post #135, you would see how the values I listed are more in common with a stable long term commitment, and not a fleeting casual fling.

No idea how or why you came up with that stuff, sorry.

143 posted on 07/04/2006 1:06:06 PM PDT by HitmanLV ("5 Minute Penalty for #40, Ann Theresa Calvello!" - RIP 1929-2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]


To: HitmanLV
No idea how or why you came up with that stuff, sorry.

Because you talk about dating women as plural and the field loaded with wide ranging choices, and you spin it to sound you've sampled many of them. :~D Guess that's how I got it. Clearly, if a woman can't hold your interest past her 30-somethingish birthday, you're going to have to drop them all eventually :~)

155 posted on 07/04/2006 1:32:58 PM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson