[Markjwyatt]

I cut this from the blog, but it is a slightly outdated version. Nothing significant, just the current version reads a little easier.

MArk

[Darkwolf377]

THE EARTH IS AT CENTER AND IS NOT MOVING.

Why could it move when it's flat?

[Michael Goldsberry]

You don't really believe this, do you?

[saganite]

Ping! A companion piece to the creationist mythology. Enjoy!

[RobbyS]

Showing that at the time of Galileo's trial that what he said was not proved beyond all doubt. He went far beyond the evidence. At the same time, we must remember that it wa Aristotelians professors , not the Church, who were most resistent to his theories.

[catholicfreeper]

Good Grief, This is like the 5th Robert Sungenis related thread I seen this week. Question? Does he still have this bet out that if we can prove the universe is earth centric that he will give a person $100,000, maybe it was a million I can' remember . 2) Are you trying to trove FR to get ideas to take him up on this bet (3) IF you by some far chance win, will you freep mail the person that helped give you the "answer" to win the bet and share the grand prize.

[PatrickHenry]

"The Earth Does Not Move!" Ping List Don't ask to be added to or dropped from this list. Just don't.

[rjgrace]

Cripes! I was under the impression that Sungenis was a member of the Flat Earth Society. I was wrong! He's a member of the Earth is the Center of the Universe Society and it's his HEAD that's flat...

[Ichneumon]

This book demonstrates through history, philosophy, and mainly through science itself that modern science has not demonstrated that the earth moves or is not in the center of the universe. It demonstrates that in fact observation after observation and experiment after experiment indicate that the earth does not move and is in the center of the universe. Scientists after scientist admit candidly that "it appears that the earth is standing still" or that " we appear to have a priviliged position" (i.e., are at center). Of course there are explanations as to why every observation indicates that we are at the center and not moving, yet we "know" that we are not at center and are moving.

Sadly, this is no more bizarre or self-deluded than the folks who declare that the Earth is only a few thousand years old...

[<1/1,000,000th%]

Rather science becomes more complicated to reconcile the observations with the undemonstrated assertion that the earth is moving and not in the center.

This statement is true at least. You can simply assert that the earth is the center of the universe and let the rocket scientists use their model of the solar system to fly spacecraft.

Galileo actually stated that Copernicus description was just a model and not necessarily real anyway, so I'm not sure why Galileo is wrong as the blurb that was posted from the book says.

However, just as you can't prove the earth is not the center of the universe, you can't prove it is either. On larger scales the earth just disappears anyway. When you look at the relative motions over time of galaxies in the local cluster, the earth is ignored entirely while the centers of the galaxies as the center of mass of the galaxies is used.

[Mrs. Darla Ruth Schwerin]

"This book will change the reader's view on what is reality and what is not."

Is this real? I'm not sure of reality, ya know...