Posted on 05/22/2006 6:22:32 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
Oh no! The VRWC might start calling the grass green, and the sky blue....
....and the crazy....NUTS!
So a couple thousand DUmmies shell out $30 a quarter just to provide us with guffaws, chuckles, and belly-laughs? If I ever meet OldLeftyLawyer, the first one'll be on me.
PJ, I perceive that you are enjoying the misery foisted onto the DUmmies by Jason and William Pitt.
Tsk, tsk!!
Keep enjoying, man!
Understandable. I'm still waiting for our local Hollywood Video to get the complete Seasons 1-4 on DVD so I can catch up. I've never watched the show, but I'm dying to.
After that drunken midnight rant where he called out Skinner and called the rest of the DUmmies "sh!tbags" and "f**kwits", probably not well at all.
Well, I frankly think the DUmmies should listen to the left-handed attorney, and to a lesser extent, also to the DUmmie "Symbolman."
{The DUmmie "Symbolman" used to be "the member of democraticunderground 'Symbolman,'" but after he kissed the posterior of Fat Che, he got demoted back down to "the DUmmie 'Symbolman'".)
Both of them are right; if the Democrats hope to win any elections this year, they have to deal with issues of substance, and on a mature level.
The Democrats have consistently lost elections since 1994 because of their whining, griping, bitching, moaning, complaining, and most of all, because of their raging anger and resentment.
That is no way to win elections.
My God, if Republicans acted like DUmmies.....
I can guarantee that if--and it is a pretty big "if," no matter what the current polls say--the Republicans and conservatives suffer significant losses, there will be none of this whining and grinding and bitchery.
If--and it is a pretty big "if," no matter what the current polls say--the Republicans and conservatives suffer significant losses, the attitude from this side will be, "Oh, well, excresence happens; we'll just have to do better next time around."
We certainly aren't going to mire ourselves down in anger and self-pity and paranoid outrage; we're just going to patiently sit out the next two years and gun for 2008.
The left-handed attorney and the DUmmie "Symbolman" are trying, desperately, to get the Democrats and liberals back on track, back to dealing with matters of real importance on a mature adult level.
One wonders however if their "message" will get through.
...especially since he has recused himself from the case?
Probably in the same way that if Bush and Cheney are impeached, John Kerry or Al Gore will somehow be the President. Somewhere in the DUmmieland version of the Constitution, it says that's so.
Turned out, the suspect stool was not from his cat, but was a stray piece of Almond Roca that had fallen in the litterbox...
"Furorbunker".
Beautiful.
I hope OldLefty and symbolman prevail. We need two strong parties in this country. I do believe that strong ideas emerge from rigorous debate and advocacy. But the Dems offer nothing but name-calling and kookiness.
My thoughts exactly.
I learned this from "The Making of the President 1960" by Theodore White (I have a habit of reading very old books).
Now, America in 1960 was very different from America in 2006, but anyway, White pointed out that Wisconsin, Minnesota, Nebraska, and California had the cleanest politics, the most corrupt-free politics, of all the states.
And Massachusetts, Maryland, Georgia, and Louisiana were then the dirtiest, most corrupt states.
White, the author, pointed out this was because there was a lively, competitive two-party system in the first four states, which kept everybody honest, while in the last four states, one political party had dominated so long, and so overwhelmingly, that there was no incentive for honest, vigorous politics and government.
It does not take a whole lot of memory to recall who was dominating Massachusetts, Maryland, Georgia, and Louisiana back in 1960, by the way.
So yes, we need a strong competitive two-party system; if the Democrats dominate, we decline into Caligulan corruption, and if the Republicans dominate (too much), we get lazy.
Fat Che, possibly jealous of all the attention we've been giving the still-absent Bostonian Idiot, has weighed in tonight.
Link on my next comment.
benburch (1000+ posts) Mon May-22-06 11:40 PM
Original message
Malloy says Rove likely HAS been indicted.
In a totally sealed case. Sealed v Sealed that Fitzgerald's boss issued.
Does anybody have more on this?
Scoody Boo (111 posts) Mon May-22-06 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Yeah, lets all line up and get kicked in the head again.
Wait, don't start without me. I need to get my Ruby Red Shoes to click them together. I consulted my Magic 8 Ball and after saying "No" 16 times, it finally said "yes" when asked about a Rove indictment.
There is an equal chance that it was Bigfoot being already indicted as there is of Rove having a sealed indictment on him. Oh wait, Bigfoot is a fairy tale. Just like Jason Leopold Rove Indictment.
boloboffin (1000+ posts) Mon May-22-06 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. Perjury is a standalone crime.
If Libby or Rove perjured themselves, then away they go. Lying is lying.
LOL, a star wars reference ping, catz!
And by Miss Waverly no less! Who would've thought the queen of the dust bunny palace was Force sensitive? But everyone knows if you learn to use the dark side of the Force you achieve a power greater than any Jedi! And the Sith get the cool red synthetic crystal light sabers!
BTW, I demand somebody goes to the Penn Station Subs place on Dorsett just east of 270 in Maryland Heights...They're a pretty major chain now, and their chicken teriyaki sub is the bomb as well.
-Eric
In the Fat Che thread, the Porkster gets kudos for his avatar. El Lardo says regarding same, "I hope I have even a fraction of her bravery.
I admire her legacy greatly."
I can't place Tubby's avatar. Can you?
fat che fishing for hits.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.