Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Most likely politics.

It was cavalier of the Administration to give Luttig the back of their hands. We have too few reliable judges now on the Court of Appeals. This ABA rejection highlights how foolish it was of the Administration to allow Michael Luttig to resign from the 4th Circuit...and to antagonize him further after he left.

This should be solid evidence to all conservatives in and out of the Federalist Society that neither Gonzales nor Bush himself are true constitutional conservatives. They use us for mere convenience. And when inconvenient...out goes the conservative principle and the constitution...not to mention any judge who happens to be a stalwart.

Think how hard it would be today to get a Luttig on the bench!

1 posted on 05/11/2006 2:11:29 PM PDT by Paul Ross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Paul Ross
This ABA rejection highlights how foolish it was of the Administration to allow Michael Luttig to resign from the 4th Circuit...

The White House couldn't have stopped him, could they?

...and to antagonize him further after he left.

How did the Administration do that?

2 posted on 05/11/2006 2:15:55 PM PDT by American Quilter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Ross
This should be solid evidence to all conservatives in and out of the Federalist Society that neither Gonzales nor Bush himself are true constitutional conservatives.

Horse bunk. Ronald Reagan, may he rest in peace, did not give us 2 conservative SCOTUS appointments. He gave us Scalia--but Scalia's vote for years was cancelled by O'Connor and/or Kennedy.

I love Reagan (unfortunately I never voted for him--I was a 'rat in those days!), but to say Bush isn't a conservative on judicial appointments is balderdash.

3 posted on 05/11/2006 2:15:57 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat ((I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Ross

There have to be enough qualified judges that are conservative that we shouldn't have to try to push through unanimous "unqualified" rated judges.

I don't mind so much the majority decision ABA rulings.


4 posted on 05/11/2006 2:16:36 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Ross

ABA(TRIAL LAWYERS) = ELITE LIBERALS


5 posted on 05/11/2006 2:16:41 PM PDT by llevrok (When they come to take my guns, I will give them the lead first....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Ross
Out goes the conservative principle and the constitution...not to mention any judge who happens to be a stalwart.

Whoa, Paul ... as your article notes, the President just nominated Michael Wallace ... someone too conservative for the ABA to handle.

Not to mention Pryor, Brown, Alito, etc.

6 posted on 05/11/2006 2:17:32 PM PDT by Oliver Optic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Ross

This should be meaningless to the libs, the Democrats on the Judiciary Committee have already demonstrated that the ratings mean nothing to them.


7 posted on 05/11/2006 2:17:47 PM PDT by ladtx ("It is fatal to enter any war without the will to win it." -- -- General Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Ross

There an insider's post (to Jonah) about Luttig you need to read.

Basically, he went off the deep end.


8 posted on 05/11/2006 2:18:22 PM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Ross

Are you completely insane?

He resigned of his own free will. The admin had nothing to do with it.


9 posted on 05/11/2006 2:18:40 PM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://xanga.com/rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Ross

The ABA's Rating didn't matter a damn for any of the other nominees.

Why should this?


10 posted on 05/11/2006 2:20:11 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Ross

Why, because they ended up sending Padilla through the normal criminal process? Luttig's skin was WAY too thin in this instance, I'm afraid.


12 posted on 05/11/2006 2:22:29 PM PDT by dinoparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Ross

The ABA is an organ of the Democratic Party.


18 posted on 05/11/2006 9:22:01 PM PDT by JCEccles (Kitzmiller Syndrome: anger and paranoia that someone is harboring critical thoughts about Darwinism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson