http://www.newsmeat.com/fec/bystate_detail.php?city=POOLESVILLE&st=MD&last=MULDOON&first=JOSEPH
http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/detail.asp?CID=N00001093&cycle=2000
http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/detail.asp?CID=N00001093&cycle=2000
But remember, Chuckie only had our national security interests at heart when he opposed the deal.
------
If this had been Kerry's idea, we never would have heard from Chuckie, the 'patriotic' socialist.
Schumer- Portgate Update Ping
That will be the day!
Schumer also doesn't want to jeopardize any potential donations to his Democrat Senatorial Campaign Committee from Boeing, or Siemens, or Honeywell, three large clients of Doncasters.
"This investigation was a significant improvement over what happened before," said House Homeland Security Chairman Peter T. King, R-N.Y. "It's been much more thorough, much more detailed."
BWAAAHAAAA!!! Hey, Pete, you terrorist symp you! The UAE owns both DPW and now Doncasters.
THERE'S NO DIFFERENCE IN THE STRUCTURE OF THE DEALS!!!
You were played for a sucker by Schumer.
Schmuck.
The saddest part? Some people will still blindly agree with Chucky because a handful of faux "conservative" fossils still pretending it is the 1920's do as well.
Schumer is nothing but a pathetic, hypocritical hack.
The screamin' meamies are focussing everyone's attention on just how lame our country's security system is...
Schumer is a dunce. He said, this went through the process. So did the Dubai port deal. It went through the full legal Administrative process that all foreign deals go through and that was by many federal agencies. The RATS just needed something to make a case on and unfortunately many Republicans went along. The ports deal was nothing but the same financial dealings that go through Government daily. Had nothing to do with security. If anything it would have increased security because of the millions invested.