This is my point--we've already learned that Quaker groups have been watched (http://rawstory.com/news/2005/National_Security_Agency_spied_on_Baltimore_0110.html), so I do not believe this to only be foreign agents. That's abuse. I am aware Libby was only charged with lying to the Grand Jury, much like Clinton was. Don't tell me you think the Clinton indictment was valid and the Libby one not?
Ultimately, I'm not convinced this leak of the NSA program has "severely damaged their ability to to their job." Do you have proof?
'I am aware Libby was only charged with lying to the Grand Jury, much like Clinton was. Don't tell me you think the Clinton indictment was valid and the Libby one not?"
No, not 'much like Clinton was'. Clinton lied to the grand jury to cover up his violation of a law that Clinton had himself signed into effect. Libby violated no law and besides, it is not clear that Libby even lied to the grand jury. So far, it is only a difference in recollections between Libby and others. Now, if you want to claim that Clinton didn't remember having sex with a woman in his private office on numerous occassions, please proceed.
Ultimately, I'm not convinced this leak of the NSA program has "severely damaged their ability to to their job." Do you have proof?
More to the point, do you have proof that it hasn't?
At least you are sticking around to answer for your post
which is more than most liberals do.
Welcome to FreeRepublic.
There's hope for you yet.
I was stationed at Ft. Meade before I retired. Most folks at the NSA are pretty good and decent people. They are average folks doing their job. I wouldn't worry about them. I do know that when a program gets compromised the bad guys change their tactics and puts the country in jeopardy for a time till other means are used to gather information again.
Who's saying the Libby indictment isn't valid? It hasn't gone to trial yet, so it remains to be seen.
Raw Story? You have got to be kidding me. You publicly admit to reading that garbage?