To: areafiftyone
Hint: the Imam doesn't care about the true nature of the picture, so long as it suits his whackadoodle needs. None of the folks in his audience would be affected by this expose -- if they even saw it in the first place.
2 posted on
02/07/2006 9:06:59 AM PST by
r9etb
To: areafiftyone
Are you sure that isn't Mohammed?
3 posted on
02/07/2006 9:08:10 AM PST by
theDentist
(Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
To: areafiftyone
I dunno. Sure as shooting looks like Moo-ham-ate to me.
To: areafiftyone
5 posted on
02/07/2006 8:22:25 PM PST by
anymouse
To: areafiftyone
I just heard about this story on the John Bachelor's Radio Show tonight, areafiftyone.
Anyone care to bet it won't run in the Slimes, WaPo, CNN or any of the Alphabet Networks?
Jack.
6 posted on
02/07/2006 10:02:05 PM PST by
Jack Deth
(Knight Errant and Disemboweler of the WFTD Thread)
To: areafiftyone
Has anyone asked Al Jazzera to explain why they haven't reported this? It would be very easy for them to compare what's being circulated as being published and what was actually being published. They have far more access to this material and to those involved than bloggers or even FOX News which also reported it.
Not reporting that the most offensive cartoons were in fact not published but created apparently by Muslims would make the Islamic news agencies culpable in the deaths, injuries and destruction that has gone on.
Also if people are going to be upset with these images they should be upset with those responsible for the more offensive cartoons. If these reports are correct these people were fully aware of how offensive these fake cartoons were and the anger should really be pointed there way.
7 posted on
02/07/2006 11:12:23 PM PST by
airedale
( XZ)
To: areafiftyone
8 posted on
02/07/2006 11:14:12 PM PST by
nopardons
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson