Posted on 01/23/2006 8:50:04 AM PST by 1curiousmind
Admittedly, every large gathering of US citizens is a potential target for a terrorist attack. And every Superbowl since 9/11 has had the potential to be a target due to the world-wide spotlight and the cultural significance of a uniquely American spectacle.
However, what makes this year's Superbowl in Detroit different is its location. The venue, Ford Field, is located less than 7,000 ft from Canada. Another venue, the Expo Center, is right on the water, less than 2,000 feet from the Canadian side. It will be hosting a 5-day event for children called "The NFL Experience".
HERE'S WHAT SCARES ME: This time terrorists could launch several different kinds of attacks from outside the country. No more need to sneak across the border. In my opinion, that is something that we should be very concerned about.
We should remember that some of the 9/11 attackers entered the US from Canada in the preceding days. Another potential attack was, by a stroke of luck, intercepted at a border crossing near Seattle. Canada is known for its relaxed immigration policy. The Canadian government seems to be continuing to operate with a pre 9/11 mentality. Even their border agents have held repeated strikes because they are not allowed to carry firearms. http://www.wxyz.com/wxyz/nw_local_news/article/0,2132,WXYZ_15924_4228631,00.html
Both Toronto and Montreal (not to mention metro Detroit) have very sizable Muslim and Middle eastern populations. Thousands are expected to visit Windsor and Detroit from these cities during the Superbowl.
Add to this the timing of BinLaden's latest audiotape. Even some of his statements indicate that they have been patiently awaiting the right time to strike and soon this will take place in our "heartland".
A simple search of this website reveals some patterns of possible former attempts that were thwarted. Like the DC to Houston flight (CO 1519) that was cancelled at the last minute during the 2004 Superbowl due to a specific terror threat. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1069659/posts
On Oct 2, 2005 a student at Oklahoma University reportedly blew himself up outside a packed stadium of 84,000. The act was officially ruled a suicide even though he had been involved at a local Mosque (one that had ties to the 9/11 terrorists) Even his roommate was a Pakistani that had a plane ticket to Algeria. http://tapscottscopydesk.blogspot.com/2006/01/from-ou-to-algeria-was-suicide-bomber.html
QUESTION: Had you even heard of this? Not me!
Then on Dec 23 three Algerians were arrested in Italy and it was reported that plans were uncovered to blowup US stadiums among other targets. http://www.turkishpress.com/news.asp?id=93048 Coincidence? Or did the FBI play dumb in order to get to this Algerian group?
So back to my original point: Are we sure that Canada is on top of this potential threat? What about Canadian airspace? A plane loaded with explosives could reach Ford Field within 3-5 seconds of entering US airspace. Shoulder-launched grenades could easily reach the Expo Center with accuracy. An attack by boat is also possible. And what about the Ambassador bridge and the Detroit/Windsor Tunnel? I believe that both of these are vulnerable to attack without the need to pass through US Customs. Windsor hotels and Casinos will be packed with US visitors as well. I think these are enough examples to make it clear that we are depending on our good neighbor to the north to help protect us this time. Is our trust well-placed? I have my doubts.
Actually, on that part of the border, Canada is our neighbor to the south. They get a big kick out of that in Windsor. Along the riverfront, there's a marker in the spot that's due south of Detroit.
"Awe shucks, I know its a good question but we get so few chances to be ibtz. Can't we just zot him alittle?"
Play nice. LOL
You can all relax....just go 2 miles in any direction into
the city of Detoliet from Ford Field...and it looks like
the city has been attacked and destroyed. This would confuse
any would be terrorists.
From: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1564520/posts?page=6
"An unspecified number of Canadian border agents, who are unarmed, left their posts during the incident because they were concerned about their safety, said Paula Shore, a spokeswoman for the Canada Border Services Agency. Managers took over and security was not compromised, she said."
Check out this latest incident. Imagine what they'd do in the midst of a terrorist attack. I bet the new Conservative Govt. acts quickly to issue guns, especially after this.
http://www.superbowl.com/news/story/9190135
Terrorist would love to attack the Superbowl. However, they will not. I cannot see them taking such a risk on a day when security will be so high. They have always hit us when we least expect it, when they have a better chance to succeed.. The Superbowl will be safe.. Security measures are planned years before the event even takes place.. Arizona has already been planning for security for the 2008 Superbowl.
It is not to say an attack could not happen somewhere else on that day to draw attention away from the game.. but i think one of the safest places to be that day will be in Detroit.
Wrong. Dearborn has the largest population of Arabs outside of the middle east.
nobody knows where dearborn is
very encouraging to hear. also a good sign that Condi will be at the game. however, if something "comes up" that prevents her from attending...then we should rethink the safety issue.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.