[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

Caught REP Curt Weldon on Lou Dobbs Moneyline today saying that he has been told (DOD I presume) that some Able Danger participants will be allowed to testify at his hearing.....

[AgThorn]

Now here's a jewel Q & A:

Q: Sharp words. Speaking of the commission: I followed hours of testimony; it was obvious that the five democrats were partisan members to the fullest extant. It appeared that the democrats were more interested in Bush’s 8 months, than Clinton’s 8 years. Is this what you want from a 9/11 investigation, especially now that you tell me that the commission was completely not interested in following Able Danger. Is [it not] a sign of partisan [ship]?


A: I think it is a sign of grouse failure. If you look at the 9/11 Commission [you will see that] they made a deliberate effort to only investigate from ‘99, ‘98 onward, whish meant they eliminated any ties that excited between other activities, between other bombings, [and] the ’93 attacks. That was because there were commissioners, especially people like (former deputy attorney general) Jaime Gorelick, who did not want anything prier to ’98 to be looked at. That’s a gross injustice and in my opinion caused the 9/11 Commission report not to be thorough.

[krunkygirl]

BUMP and hoping this will go back to the top of people's important issues to follow closely...

[cricket]

Imagine if Senator McCain cared about this. . .save his 'own name' on a torture bill. . .

[cricket]

Weldon offers that he has the signatures of many in Congress. . .Repubs and Dems have signed on and takes this to mean there is little partisanship preventing this investigation - which still is not on the calendar, if I read correctly. . .

I would not trust the motives of many of these Dems. . .personally think they could just be playing along. . .they know they can alway say.. .I signed on. . .before I signed off. . .before I signed on. . .